Thursday, December 30, 2004

We need to stop.

Just stop.

Stop for a moment.

Before anybody

Says or does anything

That may hurt anyone else.

We need to be silent.

Just silent.

Silent for a moment.

Before we forever lose

The blessing of songs

That grow in our hearts.

We need to notice.

Just notice.

Notice for a moment.

Before the future slips away

Into ashes and dust of humility.

Stop, be silent, and notice.

In so many ways, we are the same.

Our differences are unique treasures.

We have, we are, a mosaic of gifts

To nurture, to offer, to accept.

We need to be.

Just be.

Be for a moment.

Kind and gentle, innocent and trusting,

Like children and lambs,

Never judging or vengeful

Like the judging and vengeful.

And now, let us pray,

Differently, yet together,

Before there is no earth, no life,

No chance for peace.



*note: Please Remember 107 riders heading to Wounded Knee, a Ride on horse back comemorating the massacre of their ancestors for a healing....(more riders came up from Pine Ridge, will be more like 300 in the end)....many are children....all praying> for Peace, health for their people, strength for their children's children to survive the impending.....Remember they ride on x-mas day.....also Remember the Run to Mankato that is happening as well, commemorating the 38 that were hung x-mas eve....Remember every morning is started with a circle of prayer, "that there will be no more Wounded Knees throughout the world."

Tuesday, December 28, 2004

CHRISTMAS DAY 1914

I thought about what I might add as commentary to this but nothing comes to mind. I am at a loss for words to describe the feelings that this story invokes. Once again we have friends and loved ones who will be seperated from us due to the "necessities" of war. My Christmas wish for all soldiers everywhere is that they can experience what these soldiers did 90 years ago............PEACE......................Scott

Christmas Day, 1914
My dear sister Janet,
It is 2:00 in the morning and most of our men are asleep in their dugouts -- yet I could not sleep myself before writing to you of the wonderful events of Christmas Eve. In truth, what happened seems almost like a fairy tale, and if I hadn't been through it myself, I would scarce believe it. Just imagine: While you and the family sang carols before the fire there in London, I did the same with enemy soldiers here on the battlefields of France!

As I wrote before, there has been little serious fighting of late. The first battles of the war left so many dead that both sides have held back until replacements could come from home. So we have mostly stayed in our trenches and waited.
But what a terrible waiting it has been! Knowing that any moment an artillery shell might land and explode beside us in the trench, killing or maiming several men. And in daylight not daring to lift ourheads above ground, for fear of a sniper's bullet.
And the rain -- it has fallen almost daily. Of course, it collects right in our trenches, where we must bail it out with pots and pans.And with the rain has come mud -- a good foot or more deep. It splatters and cakes everything, and constantly sucks at our boots. One new recruit got his feet stuck in it, and then his hands too when he tried to get out -- just like in that American story of the tar baby!

Through all this, we couldn't help feeling curious about the German soldiers across the way. After all, they faced the same dangers we did, and slogged about in the same muck. What's more, their first trench was only 50 yards from ours. Between us lay No Man's Land, bordered on both sides by barbed wire -- yet they were close enough we sometimes heard their voices.
Of course, we hated them when they killed our friends. But other times, we joked about them and almost felt we had something in common.And now it seems they felt the same.

Just yesterday morning -- Christmas Eve Day -- we had our first good freeze. Cold as we were, we welcomed it, because at least the mud froze solid. Everything was tinged white with frost, while a bright sun shone over all. Perfect Christmas weather.
During the day, there was little shelling or rifle fire from either side. And as darkness fell on our Christmas Eve, the shooting stopped entirely. Our first complete silence in months! We hoped it might promise a peaceful holiday, but we didn't count on it. We'd been told the Germans might attack and try to catch us off guard.
I went to the dugout to rest, and lying on my cot, I must have drifted asleep. All at once my friend John was shaking me awake, saying, "Come and see! See what the Germans are doing!" I grabbed my rifle, stumbled out into the trench, and stuck my head cautiously above the sandbags.
I never hope to see a stranger and more lovely sight. Clusters of tiny lights were shining all along the German line, left and right as faras the eye could see.
"What is it?" I asked in bewilderment, and John answered, "Christmas trees!"
And so it was. The Germans had placed Christmas trees in front of their trenches, lit by candle or lantern like beacons of good will.
And then we heard their voices raised in song.
"Stille nacht, heilige nacht...."
This carol may not yet be familiar to us in Britain, but John knew it and translated: "Silent night, holy night." I've never heard one lovelier -- or more meaningful, in that quiet, clear night, its dark softened by a first-quarter moon.
When the song finished, the men in our trenches applauded. Yes,British soldiers applauding Germans! Then one of our own men started singing, and we all joined in.
"The first Nowell, the angel did say...."
In truth, we sounded not nearly as good as the Germans, with their fine harmonies. But they responded with enthusiastic applause of their own and then began another.
"O Tannenbaum, o Tannenbaum...."
Then we replied.
"O come all ye faithful...."
But this time they joined in, singing the same words in Latin.
"Adeste fideles...."
British and German harmonizing across No Man's Land! I would have thought nothing could be more amazing -- but what came next was more so.
"English, come over!" we heard one of them shout. "You no shoot, we no shoot."
There in the trenches, we looked at each other in bewilderment. Then one of us shouted jokingly, "You come over here."
To our astonishment, we saw two figures rise from the trench, climb over their barbed wire, and advance unprotected across No Man's Land.One of them called, "Send officer to talk."
I saw one of our men lift his rifle to the ready, and no doubt others did the same -- but our captain called out, "Hold your fire." Then he climbed out and went to meet the Germans halfway. We heard them talking, and a few minutes later, the captain came back with a German cigar in his mouth!
"We've agreed there will be no shooting before midnight tomorrow," he announced. "But sentries are to remain on duty, and the rest of you, stay alert."
Across the way, we could make out groups of two or three men starting out of trenches and coming toward us. Then some of us were climbing out too, and in minutes more, there we were in No Man's Land, over a hundred soldiers and officers of each side, shaking hands with men we'd been trying to kill just hours earlier!
Before long a bonfire was built, and around it we mingled -- British khaki and German grey. I must say, the Germans were the better dressed, with fresh uniforms for the holiday.
Only a couple of our men knew German, but more of the Germans knew English. I asked one of them why that was.
"Because many have worked in England!" he said. "Before all this, I was a waiter at the Hotel Cecil. Perhaps I waited on your table!"
"Perhaps you did!" I said, laughing.
He told me he had a girlfriend in London and that the war had interrupted their plans for marriage. I told him, "Don't worry. We'll have you beat by Easter, then you can come back and marry the girl."
He laughed at that. Then he asked if I'd send her a postcard he'd give me later, and I promised I would.
Another German had been a porter at Victoria Station. He showed me a picture of his family back in Munich. His eldest sister was so lovely, I said I should like to meet her someday. He beamed and said he would like that very much and gave me his family's address.
Even those who could not converse could still exchange gifts -- our cigarettes for their cigars, our tea for their coffee, our corned beef for their sausage. Badges and buttons from uniforms changed owners, and one of our lads walked off with the infamous spiked helmet! I myself traded a jackknife for a leather equipment belt -- a fine souvenir to show when I get home.
Newspapers too changed hands, and the Germans howled with laughter at ours. They assured us that France was finished and Russia nearly beaten too. We told them that was nonsense, and one of them said,"Well, you believe your newspapers and we'll believe ours."
Clearly they are lied to -- yet after meeting these men, I wonder how truthful our own newspapers have been. These are not the "savage barbarians" we've read so much about. They are men with homes and families, hopes and fears, principles and, yes, love of country. In other words, men like ourselves. Why are we led to believe otherwise?
As it grew late, a few more songs were traded around the fire, and then all joined in for -- I am not lying to you -- "Auld Lang Syne."Then we parted with promises to meet again tomorrow, and even sometalk of a football match.
I was just starting back to the trenches when an older German clutched my arm. "My God," he said, "why cannot we have peace and all go home?"
I told him gently, "That you must ask your emperor."
He looked at me then, searchingly. "Perhaps, my friend. But also we must ask our hearts."
And so, dear sister, tell me, has there ever been such a Christmas Evein all history? And what does it all mean, this impossible befriending of enemies?
For the fighting here, of course, it means regrettably little. Decent fellows those soldiers may be, but they follow orders and we do the same. Besides, we are here to stop their army and send it home, and never could we shirk that duty.
Still, one cannot help imagine what would happen if the spirit shown here were caught by the nations of the world. Of course, disputes must always arise. But what if our leaders were to offer well wishes in place of warnings? Songs in place of slurs? Presents in place of reprisals? Would not all war end at once?
All nations say they want peace. Yet on this Christmas morning, I wonder if we want it quite enough.
Your loving brother,
Tom ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The two songs below are about what is described above. Thefirst song is written by Joe Henry and Garth Brooks, the second by JohnMcCutcheon.

BELLEAU WOOD
Oh, the snowflakes fell in silence
Over Belleau Wood that night
For a Christmas truce had been declared
By both sides of the fight
As we lay there in our trenches
The silence broke in two
By a German soldier singing
A song that we all knew.
Though I did not know the language
The song was "Silent Night"
Then I heard by buddy whisper,"All is calm and all is bright"
Then the fear and doubt surrounded me
'Cause I'd die if I was wrong
But I stood up in my trench
And I began to sing along
Then across the frozen battlefield
Another's voice joined in
Until one by one each man became
A singer of the hymn
Then I thought that I was dreaming
For right there in my sight
Stood the German soldier
'Neath the falling flakes of white
And he raised his hand and smiled at me
As if he hoped to say
Here's hoping we both live
To see us find a better way
Then the devil's clock struck midnight
And the skies lit up again
And the battlefield where heaven stood
Was blown to hell again
But for just one fleeting moment
The answer seemed so clear
Heaven's not beyond the clouds
It's just beyond the fear
No, heaven's not beyond the clouds
It's for us to find it here.


CHRISTMAS IN THE TRENCHES
My name is Francis Tolliver, I come from Liverpool.
Two years ago the war was waiting for me after school.
To Belgium and to Flanders, to Germany to here
I fought for King and country I love dear.
'Twas Christmas in the trenches, where the frost so bitter hung,
The frozen fields of France were still, no Christmas song was sung
Our families back in England were toasting us that day
Their brave and glorious lads so far away.
I was lying with my messmate on the cold and rocky ground
When across the lines of battle came a most peculiar sound
Says I, ``Now listen up, me boys!'' each soldier strained to hear
As one young German voice sang out so clear.
``He's singing bloody well, you know!'' my partner says to me
Soon, one by one, each German voice joined in harmony
The cannons rested silent, the gas clouds rolled no more
As Christmas brought us respite from the war
As soon as they were finished and a reverent pause was spent
``God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen'' struck up some lads from Kent
The next they sang was ``Stille Nacht.'' ``Tis `Silent Night','' says I
And in two tongues one song filled up that sky`
`There's someone coming toward us!'' the front line sentry cried
All sights were fixed on one long figure trudging from their side
His truce flag, like a Christmas star, shown on that plain so bright
As he, bravely, strode unarmed into the night
Soon one by one on either side walked into No Man's Land
With neither gun nor bayonet we met there hand to hand
We shared some secret brandy and we wished each other well
And in a flare-lit soccer game we gave 'em hell
We traded chocolates, cigarettes, and photographs from home
These sons and fathers far away from families of their own
Young Sanders played his squeezebox and they had a violin
This curious and unlikely band of men
Soon daylight stole upon us and France was France once more
With sad farewells we each prepared to settle back to war
But the question haunted every heart that lived that wonderous night
``Whose family have I fixed within my sights?'''
Twas Christmas in the trenches where the frost, so bitter hung
The frozen fields of France were warmed as songs of peace were sung
For the walls they'd kept between us to exact the work of war
Had been crumbled and were gone forevermore
My name is Francis Tolliver, in Liverpool I dwell
Each Christmas come since World War I, I've learned its lessons well
That the ones who call the shots won't be among the dead and lame
And on each end of the rifle we're the same


===================================This message has been brought to you by ZNet(http://www.zmag.org). Visit our site for subscription options.

GOLDWYNISM

GOLDWYNISM (GOLD-wi-niz-em) noun.
A humorous statement or phrase resulting from the use of incongruous or contradictory words, situations, idioms, etc.

After Samuel Goldwyn (1879-1974), Polish-born US film producer, known for such remarks. Born Schmuel Gelbfisz, he changed his name to Samuel Goldfish after he went to UK, and to Samuel Goldwyn after moving to the US. Here are some examples of Goldwynisms:

o Include me out.
o When I want your opinion I will give it to you.
o I'll give you a definite maybe.
o If I could drop dead right now, I would be the happiest man alive.
o Anybody who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined.
o I may not always be right, but I am never wrong.
o In two words im-possible.
[And then our favorite: "Don't even ignore him."]
http://wordsmith.org

CHRIST CHALLENGED EMPIRE

THE FORGOTTEN CHRISTMAS STORY: CHRIST CHALLENGED EMPIRE
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/12/21/the_politics_of_the_christmas_story/

JAMES CARROLL, BOSTON GLOBE - The single most important fact about the birth of Jesus, as recounted in the Gospels, is one that receives almost no emphasis in the American festival of Christmas. The child who was born in Bethlehem represented a drastic political challenge to the imperial power of Rome. The nativity story is told to make the point that Rome is the enemy of God, and in Jesus, Rome's day is over.
The Gospel of Matthew builds its nativity narrative around Herod's determination to kill the baby, whom he recognizes as a threat to his own political sway. The Romans were an occupation force in Palestine, and Herod was their puppet-king. To the people of Israel, the Roman occupation, which preceded the birth of Jesus by at least 50 years, was a defilement, and Jewish resistance was steady. (The historian Josephus says that after an uprising in Jerusalem around the time of the birth of Jesus, the Romans crucified 2,000 Jewish rebels.)
Herod was right to feel insecure on his throne. In order to preempt any challenge from the rumored newborn "king of the Jews," Herod murdered "all the male children who were 2 years old or younger." Joseph, warned in a dream, slipped out of Herod's reach with Mary and Jesus. Thus, right from his birth, the child was marked as a political fugitive.
The Gospel of Luke puts an even more political cast on the story. The narrative begins with the decree of Caesar Augustus calling for a world census -- a creation of tax rolls that will tighten the empire's grip on its subject peoples. It was Caesar Augustus who turned the Roman republic into a dictatorship, a power-grab he reinforced by proclaiming himself divine.
His census decree is what requires the journey of Joseph and the pregnant Mary to Bethlehem, but it also defines the context of their child's nativity as one of political resistance. When the angel announces to shepherds that a "savior has been born," as scholars like Richard Horsley point out, those hearing the story would immediately understand that the blasphemous claim by Caesar Augustus to be "savior of the world" was being repudiated.
When Jesus was murdered by Rome as a political criminal -- crucifixion was the way such rebels were executed -- the story's beginning was fulfilled in its end. But for contingent historical reasons (the savage Roman war against the Jews in the late first century, the gradual domination of the Jesus movement by Gentiles, the conversion of Constantine in the early fourth century) the Christian memory deemphasized the anti-Roman character of the Jesus story. Eventually, Roman imperialism would be sanctified by the church, with Jews replacing Romans as the main antagonists of Jesus, as if he were not Jewish himself. (Thus, Herod is remembered more for being part-Jewish than for being a Roman puppet.)
NAUGHTY AND NICE 2004
The Progress Report makes this year's holiday list and checks it twice

Naughty: Ron Artest, for punching out the front row at an NBA game.
Nice: Mark Cuban and Dallas Mavericks season ticket holders, for offering 140 front row seats to American soldiers wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Naughty: Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, for sending U.S. soldiers into battle without the equipment and armor they need to fight.
Nice: Grassroots charity groups like "Give 2 The Troops" and "Operation Gratitude," for sending care packages, supplies and reminders of home to American troops abroad.

Naughty: Merck, for spending millions to market the pain-reliever Vioxx to consumers long after the company knew it was unsafe.
Nice: Dr. David Graham, of the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, for fighting to keep dangerous drugs off the market.

Naughty: Bernard Kerik, for turning an apartment donated for weary Ground Zero police and rescue workers into a love nest for his adulterous affairs.
Nice: Miramax Films, for putting the kibosh on Kerik's summer blockbuster biopic.

Naughty: Congress, for underfunding the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). allocating "$164 million less than needed to cover the expected 24 percent increase in home heating costs" this winter.
Nice: Richard Hamann and his wife, Donna, for paying the electricity bills for the entire town of Anthon, Iowa, because they wanted to give something back to their community.

Naughty: NRA Radio, for broadcasting anti-gun-control propaganda and calling it legitimate news.
Nice: Ed Schultz, Arnie Arnesen, Tony Trupiano, Thom Hartmann, Wendy Wilde, Al Franken, Katherine Lanpher and the rest of the Air America crew, for showing progressive radio can be thought-provoking, hard-hitting and fun.

Naughty: Department of Homeland Security, for omitting "major sites" like chemical plants and dams from its unfinished national database of potential terrorist targets.
Nice: Department of Homeland Security, for including "water parks and miniature golf courses" in the national database. At your local putt putt, the terrorists never win.

Naughty: The Environmental Protection Agency, for using camcorders to bribe parents into offering up their toddlers as guinea pigs for a study about the dangers of pesticides on children…sponsored by the chemical industry.
Nice: The Natural Resources Defense Council, for fighting to protect kids from the harmful effects of pesticides and chemicals.

Naughty: Right-wing conservatives in the House of Representatives, for changing ethics rules so Tom DeLay (R-TX) could one day be their indicted leader.
Nice: Whistleblowers like Bunnatine Greenhouse, Richard Foster and Paul O'Neill, for holding our government to a higher ethical standard.

Naughty: Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, for letting a machine do his work (and not hand-signing condolence letters to grieving families).
Nice: Ashlee Simpson, for letting a machine do her work (and not forcing us to listen to her natural singing voice).

Naughty: Medicare head Tom Scully, Rep. Billy Tauzin, Rep. James Greenwood and trade representatives Ralph Ives and Claude Burcky, for using public service for personal benefit, taking lucrative, top-dollar jobs with the pharmaceutical industry they had formerly regulated.
Nice: Rep. Henry Waxman, for using public service for public benefit, compiling reports on everything from the Halliburton to undue secrecy in the White House.

Naughty: Russian President Vladimir Putin, for single-handedly shutting down the press, jailing his political opposition and trying to validate his hand-picked, fraudulently elected lapdog in Ukraine.
Nice: Viktor Yushchenko and supporters of the Orange Revolution, for fighting against all odds -- including poison -- to bring democracy to the Ukraine

Naughty: Bill "I Like Families" Donahue, for using his pulpit to launch partisan, hate-filled attacks.
Nice: The Reverend Jim Wallis, for teaching us something about real "moral values."

Naughty: Alberto Gonzales, for crafting memos which provided legal justification for torturing detainees.
Nice: The International Committee of the Red Cross, for exposing brutal treatment of detainees in U.S. custody.

Naughty: EPA administrator Mike Leavitt, for blaming pollution on poverty.
Nice: The Union of Concerned Scientists, for giving us the facts about global warming, pollution, clean energy and the Bush administration's ideological approach to science.

Naughty: Sinclair Media, for planning to run an hour long anti-Kerry screed as "news" just before the U.S. presidential election.
Nice: Media Matters and the blogosphere, for forcing Sinclair to change its plans. (And continuing to demand that Sinclair stop broadcasting one-sided political spin.)

Naughty: Sen. Norm Coleman, for using the oil-for-food scandal as an excuse to launch an attack against the United Nations.
Nice: U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, for launching the first serious attempt to reform the United Nations and bring it into the 21st Century.

Naughty: The Kuwaiti Hilton, for giving Halliburton's employees a place to stay while they bilked US taxpayers.
Nice: Paris Hilton, for bringing the "simple life" to Washington, D.C.

Naughty: Bill O'Reilly, for claiming Christmas is "under siege."
Nice: Americans, for not laying siege to Christmas.

Happy Holidays from The Progress Report Team and everyone at American Progress, dedicated to making America a little less naughty and a lot more nice.

Saturday, December 25, 2004

Welcome To Wal-World

MULTINATIONAL MONITOR, October 2003
Title: “Welcome to Wal-World”
Author: Andy Rowell
Faculty Evaluators: Phil McGough, Laurie DawsonStudent Researcher: Mariah Wegener-Vernagallo, Doug Reynolds

“Country by country, the world is discovering the great value of shopping at Wal-Mart,” says John Menzer, president of the international division of Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer. Menzer’s vision is one where Wal-Mart becomes a global brand, just like McDonald’s or Coca- Cola, monopolizing the global retail market.

What Menzer fails to tell shareholders is the fact that Wal-Mart is also facing lots of consumer pressure both at home and abroad for some of their business activities. Wal-Mart’s strategy of corporate takeovers in other countries has come into question. When entering a new market, the company never opens directly to the public; instead they buy into an already fully operational company and slowly take control. First, a large competitor is eliminated, then Wal-Mart gains real estate and employees creating a massive presence in its targeted location.
In addition, by taking over existing stores rather than opening new ones, Wal-Mart avoids the community opposition that it faces in the U.S.

Al Norman, the founder of Sprawl-Busters, who has been described by CBS’s “60 Minutes” as the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement says. “What Wal-Mart did in Mexico was very instructive. Mexico was a testing ground for the method of operation. They basically acquired existing stores. They moved into Mexico and that became the theme in other countries like the UK, Germany, and Japan. They would buy into an existing operation, rather then start from scratch.”

Wal-Mart opposition overseas has been from unions (over low pay), local regulators (over predatory pricing), and small businesses that face financial ruin. Recently, the company has also come under pressure from the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) in the US for not allowing union representation in their superstores. With new superstores opening that contain groceries as well as all other Wal-Mart amenities, competitor supermarket chains with unions are worried about their future revenues.

Just as Wal-Mart exports sprawl, it exports bad labor practices. Uni-Comerce, the global trade union for commercial workers, characterizes Wal-Mart as “an obsessively anti-union company at home and abroad.” The company “builds its competitive advantage on low wages, poor benefits, and a squeeze on producers. Through predatory pricing, it can force both large and small competitors out of business,” according to Uni-Commerce. “Worldwide, Wal-Mart is the most serious threat to employment, wages, and working conditions in commerce.” The problem with low pay and unions is one of the main obstacles the company faces in its international expansion plans. The rift between unions and Wal-Mart, say financial analysts Fallstreet.com, is “intensifying with each global step the company makes.”

Wal-Mart also threatens small shops in countries in which it does not even operate. In 1998 the Irish government adopted a cap on the size of stores. But companies like Swedish furniture retailer IKEA and Wal-Mart are believed to be pressuring government officials to lift the cap. The only place such large stores would be built would be out of town, creating sprawl. “Any country that has predominantly smaller stores will be shocked by the superstore format,” argues Norman.

“In five or six years, you could be talking about 5,000 to 6,000 Wal-Mart stores outside of the United States,” says Norman. “Wal-Mart is Americanizing retailing around the world. It is a really undesirable outcome both culturally and economically for a U.S. company to be exercising so much power.”

UPDATE BY ANDY ROWELL: Wal-Mart’s unstoppable spread continues. In September 2003 Wal-Mart announced the "continuation of its aggressive unit growth for the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2004". In the U.S. Wal-Mart planned to open approximately 50 to 55 new discount stores, 220 to 230 new Supercenters, 25-30 new Neighborhood Markets and 35-40 new Sam’s Clubs. Wal-Mart International planned to open 130 to 140 units in existing markets.
In March 2004, Wal-Mart Brazil announced the acquisition of Bompreco, a retail chain in northeastern Brazil with 118 units (hypermarkets, supermarkets and mini markets).
In April 2004 the company’s international operations stood at 1,494 total units; Mexico (641) Puerto Rico (53) Canada (236) Argentina (11) Brazil (144) China (35) South Korea (15) Germany (92) United Kingdom (267). Its international sales were $47.5 billion, a 16.6 percent increase over the previous year. International operating profit was $2.3 billion, an increase of 18.6 percent compared to the previous fiscal year.
And so it goes on. Where will the next Wal-Mart be? Will it be your local community? Do you want a world run by Wal-Mart, where raw economic muscle of a huge global retailer can out-price any local competitor and put them out of business? In this cut price war the consumer will lose, the environment will lose and communities will lose.
In the U.K, Wal-Mart’s takeover of Asda has had a devastating effect. Award-wining food journalist Joanna Blythman’s new book called "Shopped: The Shocking Power of British Supermarkets" published May 2004 outlines how: "I learned that UK supermarkets now jump to the tune of our second largest chain, Asda. Since 1999 when it was taken over by the biggest retailer in the world, the U.S. chain Wal-Mart, Asda’s strategy of ‘Every Day Low Pricing’, has triggered a supermarket price war in which chains without buying muscle are disadvantaged. In order to keep up with Asda, our leading chains in the UK must be ever more ruthless in the way they operate or else risk losing their place at the supermarket superpowers, top table".
This means that suppliers are squeezed, farmers are squeezed and supermarkets source from the cheapest overseas suppliers where labor, human rights and environmental standards are the lowest. Every week in the UK, 50 specialist shops like butchers and bakers are closing and one farmer or farm worker commits suicide. We enter a race to the bottom where everyone loses, especially the consumer.

Additional information: Al Norman’s Sprawl-buster, www.sprawl-busters.com;

Joanna Blythman’s “Shopped”, http://harpercollins.co.uk/books/default.aspx?id=27115;

Friends of the Earth supermarket campaign, http://www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/real_food/press_for_change/;

Coalition of groups in the UK against supermarkets, http://www.breakingthearmlock.com;

Wal-Mart and unions, http://www.union-network.org/;

selection of Andy Rowell articles, www.andyrowell.com.

Resources: Al-Norman ˆ guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement has a new book out called The Case Against Wal-Mart. To order: Call toll free (in the US) 877-386-5925 or E-mail ruth@raphel.com or visit: www.raphel.com

Nygarrd Notes

Greetings,
This week I focus on a single issue. Or, rather, a series of things that have appeared in the press that, together, illustrate a subtle variety of propaganda. That illustration is the “issue,” I guess. By going so extensively into this particular media pattern, I have the same goal that I often have: To help Notes readers to develop good thinking and reading habits.Long-time readers know that I never accuse the media of conspiring, or of intentionally misleading. But I do think the media often function as conduits for propaganda. Whether it is intentional or not is far less important, in my mind, than the fact that it happens, and why it happens, and how we can protect ourselves from it, and how we can actively counter it in our own political and educational work.
That’s what I’m up to this week. That’s often what I’m up to, come to think of it. Looking ahead, there are a lot of things on the agenda that I want to discuss as soon as possible, but first we’ll take a look at the year we’re winding up. In the spirit of reflection, next week I expect to have the Nygaard Notes Year In Review 2004. That’s always fun. And maybe a collection of the “Best of the ‘Quotes’ of the Week. People seem to like those, too.The days are getting longer now in the Northern hemisphere, and the nights shorter. Let this be a metaphor for our times.
In solidarity,
Nygaard******

1.“Quote” of the Week
The December 13th New York Times (All The News That’s Fit To Print!) had a major article on the front page about a “bitter, high-level debate over how far it can and should go in managing or manipulating information to influence opinion abroad.” A debate, that is, about how much official lying it should do. The headline read: “PENTAGON WEIGHS USE OF DECEPTION IN A BROAD ARENA; Value of Disinformation; The Nation’s Credibility is At Risk, Military Critics Contend.”That headline, itself, could be the “Quote” of the Week, as could any number of other selections from this amazing article. But I think the best comment was the 11th paragraph. “Best,” in the Nygaard Notes world, means that a quotation strikes me as some combination of informative, unintentionally revealing, unbelievable, or knee-slapping hilarious. The following “quote” fits several of the criteria, but stands out in particular for the reporter’s willingness to quote anonymous “officials” – in an article about official lying – reassuring us that they are not now lying, nor are they considering lying.
“During the cold war, American intelligence agencies had journalists on their payrolls or operatives posing as journalists, particularly in Western Europe, with the aim of producing pro-American articles to influence the populations of those countries. But officials say that no one is considering using such tactics now.”
Of course not.******
2.Mind-Reading and Propaganda: The Amazing Powers of Journalists
The job of a reporter is to report what they see and hear. Correct? How about if they can read the minds of public officials? Should they report what they see there? I’m joking, of course, but it is not at all uncommon for reporters to “report” things that they could only know if they were reading minds. And, when you see such “reporting,” you should be aware that you are reading propaganda or, as it is commonly called these days, “spin.”There are many examples to be found, from the simple and obvious to the more subtle. This issue of Nygaard Notes takes a look at four examples of mind-reading and related supernatural powers of elite journalists, all from recent months.
Example #1: “Aiming To” Do... something. Inside Cheney’s Head
In the Washington Post of July 20, on page 6, this headline appeared: “Cheney Urges Cap on Malpractice Awards; Proposal Aims to Improve Health Care.” Note the phrase “aims to.” How does the reporter – Ceci Connolly, in this case – know what the proposal “aims to” do? She can know what the proposal says. And she can ask knowledgeable sources to predict what it WILL do, or is LIKELY to do. But, as for what it “aims to” do, that is known only to the person proposing it, and perhaps to those supporting it.To understand the difference between observation and speculation, let me suggest a radical idea: sometimes the true “aims” of a political leader are different than the stated “aims.”In the current case, for example, here’s the opening paragraph: “Vice President Cheney, with a swipe at his Democratic trial-lawyer counterpart, yesterday blamed rising health care costs on ‘runaway litigation’ and promoted a $250,000 cap on medical malpractice awards as the central tenet of the White House program to improve access, affordability and quality of care.” Then we hear from other Republicans who support the bill, who agree – surprise! – that lawsuit abuse is the root of the crisis in medical care in this country.The reader had to go down to paragraph 10 to read a different opinion, which comes from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office: “An analysis by the CBO said the malpractice bill would benefit physicians and the government but would reduce private health insurance premiums a scant 0.4 percent.”It’s not until the end of the article that we read this comment from Martin J. Hatlie, “president of the Chicago-based Partnership for Patient Safety, which advises hospitals on safety improvements:” “The solution that organized medicine and the White House are supporting is a fix for the doctors to some degree. It helps keep their premiums down. It does nothing to advance the quality of care, nothing to advance the safety of care, nothing to more fairly compensate claimants or address the other really significant problems in the current medical-legal system.”So, does the reporter actually know what the Bush proposal to limit medical malpractice suits “aims to” do? No, she only knows what Bush and his supporters say their “aim” is. Those are two different things, and a good reporter would not get them confused.
Example #2: “Meant To” Do... something. Inside Republican Heads
On October 13th New York Times (All The News That’s Fit To Print!) ran a long article on the front page of the business section headlined “Bush Health Savings Accounts Slow to Gain Acceptance.” Health Savings Accounts, or HSAs, for those who do not know, are tax-free savings accounts that people can draw from to pay for out-of-pocket medical bills. If you don’t spend your tax-shielded money on health care, eventually you will be allowed to spend it on pretty much anything you want. It’s a tax shelter, in other words. As proposed by George W, families can set aside up to $5,150 per year in these accounts. The Bush Treasury Department says that HSA’s are “intended to improve access by making health insurance more affordable, particularly for those with very low incomes.”The Times article elaborates on this official motivation for the proposal. The fourth paragraph states, “The [HSA] plans...are meant to provide basic, high-deductible insurance while letting people accumulate money tax-free to be spent on medical services or saved to pay for future health care needs.” Also note the 19th paragraph, which tells us that “The health savings accounts are meant to help reduce wasteful spending by involving consumers more directly in weighing the costs of alternative types of care.”So, that’s what these accounts are “meant to” do, eh? How would one know this, unless one was a mind-reader? What we do know is what the Bush administration says is motivating the proposal. But let’s think about this for a minute.The official poverty level for a family of three in the United States is currently $15,670. Let’s imagine a family of three living just above that level, so they are not officially “poor.” Let’s say they make $16,000 per year. OK: The average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Minnesota is about $9,400 per year (over $13,000/year in California). Add $165/month for utilities (really bare bones!), and that’s another $2,000 per year. If the family could manage to eat for $3.00 per day each, that would add up to $3,300 per year. We’re up to just about $15,000 now, and I haven’t said anything about transportation, or non-health insurance (fire, theft...). Nor have I mentioned recreation, like the occasional movie, or baseball game. Meanwhile, the Kaiser Family Foundation reports that “In 2004, [health insurance] premiums reached an average of $9,950 annually for family coverage.”It must be comforting, indeed, for the “very low income” family described here ($16,000 per year, by the way, is about 50 percent higher than the current, full-time minimum wage) to know that the Bush plan will allow them to “accumulate money tax-free” to buy health insurance. There’s some “access” for you! And aren’t we all grateful that such families will be encouraged to “reduce” their “wasteful spending” on health care?To their credit, the Times balanced out their mind-reading in this case with a quotation from Princeton University economist and health policy expert Uwe E. Reinhardt. In the very last paragraph of the article, we read that Mr. Reinhardt “said that the new plans were ‘a bum deal’ for people with chronic illnesses. But ‘for chronically healthy people,’ he said, ‘it's another 401(k) savings account, and Wall Street is licking its chops at the prospect of managing the money.’”That’s a good quotation. But by stating earlier in the article that the HSA plan is “meant to” provide access to insurance and is “meant to help reduce wasteful spending,” the reporter implies that any other outcomes will be unfortunate errors, rather than the predictable and/or intended results of uncaring policy. That’s some serious “spin.”
Example #3: “Intended To” Do... something. Inside Bush’s Head
On September 3 the NY Times reported on the speech President Bush made in accepting his nomination by the Republican Party to run for a second term. The Times reported that “Under the rubric of an ‘ownership society’ intended to promote individual power and responsibility as well as to give people more of a direct financial stake in the economy, he also made a case for tax incentives to help people save for health insurance costs and for efforts by government to encourage homeownership.”More mind-reading there. Did you catch it? The reporters claim to know what the “ownership society” is “intended to promote.” What they actually know, and should report, is that some people say that this “ownership society” (whatever that may be) is “intended to” do what Bush said, and some other people say that this “ownership society” is code for an all-out attack on the last vestiges of the New Deal of the 1930s.I, myself, think this “ownership society” thing goes beyond that to an attack on the reforms made during the Progressive Era, which came before the New Deal (we’re talking here about the 1890s into the 1920s). The legal and political reforms of the Progressive Era were, in part, a response to the outrages committed by the notorious “robber barons” of the time. I suspect that the aims of those promoting what they call the “ownership society” are motivated in large part by a desire to restore some of the lost privileges that they believe should accrue to our modern-day robber barons. (One of the key reforms enacted during the Progressive Era, for instance, was the income tax. See what I mean? I’ll have more on the “ownership society” and the income tax, and related ideas, in a future Nygaard Notes.)
Example #4: “In The Interest Of... something. Inside Anonymous Heads, and Down the Memory Hole
Sometimes what appears to be mind-reading is not really that at all, but is something far worse, as in this example.On July 13 the NY Times headlined a 1000-word report “Doubts on Informant Deleted in Senate Text.” The news report told the tale of certain deletions that had been made from “a year-long, bipartisan Senate investigation” of intelligence lapses leading up to the war in Iraq. The report noted that “About one-fifth of the 511-page report still has not been made public, despite objections from both Republican and Democratic senators. As in the case of the Iraqi defector, the deletions were the result of objections raised by American intelligence agencies in the interest of protecting sources and methods...according to American government officials who have read the classified version of the Senate committee's report.”There you go: “in the interest of reporting sources and methods,” reporter Douglas Jehl says. That’s a defensible reason to keep something secret, isn’t it? But wouldn’t reporter Jehl have to be a mind-reader in order to know the reasons motivating those mysterious “American government officials” who made the deletions? Otherwise, how would he know the noble “interests” that prompted the deletion of 20 percent of a report of such major national interest? I thought this was an example of mind-reading, until I remembered another article, from the same paper, that ran three days earlier, on July 10.That article, part of a whole section about the Intelligence Committee report, was headlined “C.I.A. Deleted Large Sections, Officials Say.” In it, a different reporter – Neil A. Lewis – tells us that “The deletions have renewed a debate about whether Central Intelligence Agency officials were trying to suppress certain information to avoid embarrassment.” Hmm... a debate about the motivation for deleting huge segments of a public document, you say? Someone is debating whether the deletions were made “to avoid embarrassment” or “in the interest of protecting sources and methods?” That sounds like an important debate. But within three days it had disappeared from the Newspaper of Record, leaving only the one version remaining and consigning the important “debate” on the subject to the dustbin of history.Where’s a mind-reader when you need one?!A good reporter will distinguish between observations of verifiable facts and blind acceptance of the self-serving public relations of public figures. But not all reporters are good ones, so when you see or hear phrases like “aims to” and “intends to” and “are meant to,” or when you see or hear that some public agency is doing something “in the interest of” something, pause for a moment. Take a moment to ask yourself some questions, like, “Who says?” and “How do I know what they really ‘aim’ to do?” and “Are there other opinions on the nature of their true intentions?” If the reporter didn’t balance out their stenography of the official line with some answers to questions like these, then it might be worth your while to tune in to some other media.**********

If you have received this issue of Nygaard Notes from a friend, or by accident, or through some other bizarre quirk of inexplicable fate which leaves you with no useful return address, be aware that you can receive your own free subscription by asking for it in an E-mail sent to Nygaard Notes at Or visit the Nygaard Notes website at http://www.nygaardnotes.org/

I would like to continue to provide this service for free. You could help by making a voluntary contribution (anything you can afford, whether $5.00 or $500.00) You can donate online by going to the Nygaard Notes website at http://www.nygaardnotes.org/ Then just get out your credit card and follow the instructions. Of course, you can always just send a good old check through the mail. Make checks payable to “Nygaard Notes” and send to: Nygaard Notes, P.O. Box 14354, Minneapolis, MN 55414. Thank you!--


Jeff Nygaard
National Writers Union
Twin Cities Local #13 UAW
Nygaard Notes
http://www.nygaardnotes.org
Dear Friend:
There's no doubt about it. The past months have been rough for those of us who care about wildlife and the health of our planet. We can't candy-cane coat this one. The election results bode ill for environmental issues – already we are hearing that there will be a new push to gut the Endangered Species Act, drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other wilderness areas, and plow new roads into the last remaining roadless areas of our national forests. The folks who are leading the call for pillaging and plundering seek only short-term gain at the expense of the legacy that we should pass down to our children and grandchildren. Greed trumps fairness, selfishness leads to abuses of our planet. Their actions are not exactly in the holiday spirit, nor do they fit with the American ideal. They're like Dr. Seuss' classic character, the Grinch, who is cruel to his pet and always trying to figure out how to destroy the happiness and collective goodwill of the good citizens of Whoville – the everyplace town that represents all towns.
But in the end, the Grinch comes to his senses. We're hoping beyond hope that the greed heads in this presidential administration and Congress will do the same. Instead of seeking short-term gains, we're hoping they will recognize that great benefits can be earned by protecting wildlife and the land that we share with the animals and upon which we depend for our own lives. We're hoping that they'll understand that more jobs can be created and our children's future better secured by living sustainably – working with the planet and not against it.
The holidays are a time for hope, but at Defenders we know that hope will not be enough. We know that a visionary effort is needed to reenergize all those who already "get it" – and to convince those who don't – to spread the message that wildlife and our own welfare require us to change our ways for the better. We're asking that you continue to lead on this effort. By contacting your elected officials, by writing letters-to-the-editor, by becoming leaders in your communities and places of worship, by educating your children and by speaking up for wildlife, you've proven time and time again that you seek and demand better, more sustainable public policies.
So during this holiday season, we want to thank you for all you do! And to kick off the New Year right, we're asking that you sign, and ask your friends, family and neighbors to sign, our Endangered Species Pledge at www.saveesa.org as your gift to our planet's wildlife. It will not cost you anything, but if the Endangered Species Act is gutted, it will likely cost our diminishing wildlife their lives.
Again, thanks for all you do. And may your holidays be filled with joy and peace!
Best wishes,
Rodger SchlickeisenPresident, Defenders of Wildlife

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO DENLINES

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS? Just send an E-mail from your old address to: Changeaddress@defenders.org and put only your new e-mail address in the subject line. If you no longer have access to your old address send an e-mail to DEN@Defenders.org and in the text part of the message give us your "old" and "new" addresses.

Click here to UNSUBSCRIBE. If you don't have web access, send a separate e-mail to Denlines@den.defenders.org and put the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.

DENlines is a biweekly update of Defenders of Wildlife, a leading national conservation organization recognized as one of the nation's most progressive advocates for wildlife and its habitat. It is known for its effective leadership on endangered species issues, particularly predators such as brown bears and gray wolves. Defenders also advocates new approaches to wildlife conservation that protect species before they become endangered. Founded in 1947, Defenders is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization with more than 480,000 members and supporters.
Defenders of Wildlife1130 17th Street, NWWashington, DC 20036
Copyright Defenders of Wildlife 2004


Sunday, December 19, 2004

MASTERS OF WAR

Bob Dylan is being considered for a Noble Prize for Literature. His poetry has inspired and led many of us to question the "authority" in our lives and enabled us to lead freer lives. I for one hope that he recieves that recognition that he so greatly deserves. In a recent interview on "60 Minutes",when asked about many of those early songs, he stated that they seemed to write themselves. He felt as if he were just a conduit for those words.
As a teenager whenever I was depressed or felt particularly troubled it was Dylan to whom I turned. Listening to his music alaways seemed to make me feel better. I don't know if he was just more depressed than I was or what but the end result was that I was able to continue with my life. I want to thank Bob Dylan for being a part of my life and the lives of my generation. Even though he was writing about a different time and a different war his words are as relevent today as they were almost 40 years ago.



MASTERS OF WAR
Bob Dylan

Come you masters of war
You that build all the guns
You that build the death planes
You that build the big bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks

You that never done nothin'
But build to destroy
You play with my world
Like it's your little toy
You put a gun in my hand
And you hide from my eyes
And you turn and run farther
When the fast bullets fly

Like Judas of old
You lie and deceive
A world war can be won
You want me to believe
But I see through your eyes
And I see through your brain
Like I see through the water
That runs down my drain

You fasten the triggers
For the others to fire
Then you set back and watch
When the death count gets higher
You hide in your mansion
As young people's blood
Flows out of their bodies
And is buried in the mud

You've thrown the worst fear
That can ever be hurled
Fear to bring children
Into the world
For threatening my baby
Unborn and unnamed
You ain't worth the blood
That runs in your veins

How much do I know
To talk out of turn
You might say that I'm young
You might say I'm unlearned
But there's one thing I know
Though I'm younger than you
Even Jesus would never
Forgive what you do

Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul

And I hope that you die
And your death'll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I'll watch while you're lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I'll stand o'er your grave
Til I'm sure that you're dead


"Masters of War" startles Dylan himself. "I've never really written anything like that before," he recalls. "I don't sing songs which hope people will die, but I couldn't help it in this one. The song is a sort of striking out,a reaction to the last straw, a feeling of what can you do?" The rage (which is as much anguish as it is anger) is a away of catharsis, a way of getting temporary relief from the heavy feeling of impotence that affects many who cannot understand a civilization which juggles it's own means for oblivion and calls that performance an act toward peace.

Of all the precipitously emergent singers of folk songs in the continuing renascence of that self-assertive tradition, none has equaled Bob Dylan singularity of impact. As Harry Jackson, a cowboy singer and a painter, has exclaimed: "He's so goddamned real it's unbelievable!" The irrepressiblereality of Bob Dylan is a compound of spontaneity, candor, slicing wit and an uncommonly perceptive eye and ear for the way many of us constrict our capacity for living while a few of us don't.

Odd, scraps of Jewish information, such as the well-known factoid that Dylan's real name is Robert Zimmerman. Dylan seems quite proud of the deliberate way he performed his do-it-yourself rechristening. His original plan was to perform under his first and middle names (a technique employed by Comedy Central star Jon Stewart, whose given name is actually Jon Stewart Lebowitz). Much has been written about the fact that Dylan is a Jew.

Spend some time on Google and read some it for yourself, but for my purpose it's interesting that Dylan (a Jew?) writes and sings about Jesus and Judas. Much of this email info can be found on the following link.

http://www.bobdylan.com/linernotes/freewheelin.html

I want to be sure to give the writer credit.







Reading List 12/11/2004

Army Doctors Overwhelmed by Severity, Scope of Iraq Wounded
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104A.shtml

Don't Let Iraq Vets Become Homeless
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104D.shtml

Devastating Oil Spill in Alaska Feared
http://www.truthout.org/environment.shtml

Intelligence Bill Greatly Expands Police Powers
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104H.shtml

Le Monde To Defend the U.N.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104I.shtml

David Lytel Silencing the Vote
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104J.shtml

Bill Moyers Retiring from TV Journalism
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104L.shtml

Debate over Secret Spy Program Bursts Into the Open
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104X.shtml

FOCUS U.S. Army Plagued by Desertion and Plunging Morale
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121104Y.shtml

THE P.U.-LITZER PRIZES FOR 2004 Norman Solomon, AlterNet
There are media awards of all kinds, but none so foul andsmelly as these
.http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20714/

THE FIRE THIS TIME Kelly Hearn, AlterNet
A new report saying Latinos bear the brunt of environmentalhealth threats in the U.S. prompts soul-searching amonggreen groups and adds new fuel to the Latino environmentaljustice movement.
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/20708/

PUBLIC ACCESS, PRIVATE PROFIT Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!
A debate on who can better provide high-speed Internetaccess to American homes – local government or thetelephone and cable companies.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20713/

TARGETING TEHRAN Mariah Blake, Columbia Journalism Review
By beaming dissent into Iran, much of it aimed at improvingthe lot of women, expat broadcasters are weakening theclerics’ chokehold on news
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20707/

RUMSFELD SAYS THE DARNDEST THINGS
Christy Harvey, Judd Legum, Jonathan Baskin, Center for American Progress
The response of the Secretary of Defense to questions fromNational Guardsmen reveals the callousness of the Bushadministration.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20711/

BUSH'S POSSE ROUNDUP James Bovard, AlterNet
In its first term, the Bush administation flouted laws thatprevent the military from being involved in our domesticaffairs. Is that a G.I. knocking at your door?
http://www.alternet.org/rights/20712/

THE FUEL EMISSION WARS Sunny Lewis, Environment News Service
California has passed the nation's first-ever greenhouse gasreduction law. And Big Auto isn't going to take it lyingdown.
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/20706/

Waxman: Halliburton Iraq Contracts Pass $10 Billion Mark
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004A.shtml

Sidney Blumenthal The "Terminator" of Baghdad
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004C.shtml

David Swanson Labor at the Crossroads
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004I.shtml

C.I.A. Official Alleges Retaliation for Not Faking WMD Evidence
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004W.shtml

Homeless Iraq Vets Showing Up at Shelters
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004Y.shtml


CONGRESS IGNORES TENTH AMENDMENT AGAIN
http://www.stateline.org/stateline/?pa=story&sa=showStoryInfo&print=1&id=417890

KATHLEEN HUNTER, STATELINE - The landmark U.S. intelligence overhaul passed by Congress includes the first mandatory federal identification standards for drivers' licenses, birth certificates and other forms of state-issued ID. . . The intelligence bill, which stemmed from recommendations of the independent commission that investigated the 9-11 attacks, requires the U.S. Departments of Transportation and Homeland Security to establish minimum identification standards for drivers' licenses and other state-issued identification cards. If a state's license does not meet the standards in two years, federal agencies will not be allowed accept it as valid identification for such purposes as boarding airplanes and many other common transactions of daily life. The bill also sets a two-year deadline for states to conform with minimum standards for birth certificates. Those will be set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. John Hurson, president of the National Conference of State Legislatures has called efforts to establish minimum standards for drivers' licenses "nothing more than an end-run on states' rights." Never before has the federal government regulated state-issued drivers' licenses or birth certificates.

FOCUS: Senator Byrd Politics Surround Intelligence Reform
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121004X.shtml

THE DEMOCRATS' DA VINCI CODE David J. Sirota, The American Prospect
Encrypted within the 2004 election map is the Democrats'road map to political divinity. It is time for the party'scentrists to make way for the economic populists who rackedup wins on Nov. 2.
http://www.alternet.org/election04/20702/

NO ESCAPE FROM DEPENDENCY Michael Klare, Tomdispatch.com
America is more dependent on foreign oil than ever beforeand the Bush Administration has no exit strategy forgetting out of the perpetual crisis.
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/20701/

THE NEXT DNC CHAIR: WHY YOU SHOULD CARE Arianna Huffington, AlterNet
Anyone raising the idea that the party needs to "move to themiddle" should immediately be escorted out of the building.
http://www.alternet.org/election04/20699/

I WON'T TAKE THE COD, THANK YOU Jennifer C. Berkshire, Christian Science Monitor
Seafood lovers will have to learn to be stewards of theseas' bounty – or risk seeing their favorite fishdisappear forever.
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/20700/

WHAT NOW FOR THE NAACP? Lester Kenyatta Spence, Africana.com
With its leader stepping down, the NAACP could dissolve intointernecine warfare or it could actually make itself morerelevant for the twenty-first century.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/20695/

KEEP ON ROCKING US: AN INTERVIEW WITH JEHMU GREENT.
Eve Greenaway, WireTap
The director and spokesperson for Rock the Vote talks aboutcelebrity involvement, what she's learned from theelection, and the issues that will keep the momentum going.
http://www.alternet.org/wiretap/20691/

MEDICAL MARIJUANA KEEPS ON ROLLING Jennifer Gonnerman, Village Voice
Pot for patients may run into trouble with the SupremeCourt, but in New York the cause has grown in popularity.
http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/20693/

Steve Weissman Nukes, Neo-Cons, and the Bush Who Cried Wolf Again
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904A.shtml

Chris Hedges On War
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904E.shtml

Clinton Urges Effort to Address Energy
http://www.truthout.org/environment.shtml

Pascal Riche Santa Claus vs. Jesus
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904H.shtml

Michael Massing Iraq, the Press and the Election
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904J.shtml

Tony Kushner Despair Is a Lie We Tell Ourselves
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904K.shtml

Simon Head Inside the Leviathan
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904L.shtml

A Blueprint for Moore Bashing Matt Taibbi, New York Press.
The DLC has joined Fox News and the GOP in savaging Michael Moore, blaming him for Kerry's loss.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20650/

The 'Incredibles' Shrinking Man Ella Taylor, LA Weekly.
The 'Incredibles' is the latest installment in Hollywood's chronicling of the individual in an increasingly corporate world.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20657/

The Military Channel Rory O'Connor, MediaChannel.org.
As the lines blur ever-further between media and military 'psy-ops,' the inevitable has finally happened.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20677/

'Chilling' the Press Eric Alterman, Paul McLeary, Center for American Progress.
As long as the 'liberal media' charge carries weight in the public imagination, reporters are open to being blacklisted by powerful politicians seeking to avoid scrutiny.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20659/

The War on What, Exactly? Jacob Levenson, Columbia Journalism Review.
We know we're supposed to win the war on terror, we just don't know exactly what it is – and the press isn't helping.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20631/

******************************************************************************
FOCUS Howard Dean: The Future of the Democratic Party http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704U.shtml

FOCUS Howard Dean: "We Cannot Win by Being Republican-Lite"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120904Y.shtml
******************************************************************************

On the homefront, Democrats are talking about how to reconnect with rural voters. It's an important conversation, as much about the decline in the party's fortunes can be traced to the fact that people who live in small towns provided President Bush with overwhelming support in 2004.
As John Nichols writes in The Online Beat, "If Democrats want to improve their fortunes in the elections of 2006 and 2008, they should learn to speak once more for the interests of rural Americans. And the best place to start doing so is by challenging the pro-free trade, pro-corporate agribusiness policies of new Bush nominee Mike Johanns--and by speaking, bluntly, about the threat those policies pose to working farmers and rural America."
http://www.thenation.com/thebeat/index.mhtml?bid=1&pid=2052

The Administration's policies are also threatening the stability of the SocialSecurity system--a pillar of the New Deal which provides tens of millions ofworkers with a guaranteed retirement income as well as disability and life insurance during their working lives. For more on the threat, read ActNow, TheNation's activist weblog.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/actnow?pid=2050

And join the Campaign for America's Future's efforts to pressure Congress tohold firm on the issue.
http://action.ourfuture.org/action/index.asp?step=2&item=23131
'
IS LIBERALISM DEAD? Lakshmi Chaudhry, AlterNet
Adam Werbach argues that the moral and intellectualframework underpinning Democratic politics has becomeirrelevant. It's time to craft a new progressive vision offulfillment.
http://www.alternet.org/election04/20689/

WAL-MAO Harold Meyerson, The American Prospect
Finally Wal-Mart has a union. One small catch, though, youhave to move to China.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/20683/

THE JOY OF SEXOLOGY Christina Larson, Washington Monthly
Does it matter that Alfred Kinsey enjoyed his work more than he let on?http://www.alternet.org/movies/20692/

FACES OF DEATH Dan Kennedy, Boston Phoenix
An apparent war crime is caught on video – whyhasn't it stuck with the American public?
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20690/

A MORAL MINIMUM WAGE Peter Dreier, Kelly Candaele, The Nation
Engaging in a vigorous fight to raise our meager minimumwage is clearly the morally right thing to do. But it mayalso be the politically astute thing for Democrats to do.
http://www.alternet.org/election04/20688/

CHARITY IS NOT ENOUGH Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet
Committed Christians must move beyond personal charity toaddress economic and social conditions
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/20687/

COMMERCE ABUSE William J. Watkins Jr., The Independent Institute
If the government's argument prevails in Ashcroft v. Raich,then Congress could have an unrestrained police power toregulate all facets of American life.
http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/20685/

Senator Feingold "America Is So Much Better than This"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120804A.shtml

One Group Responsible for 99% of Indecency Complaints
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120804J.shtml

Dollar Hits New Low against Euro
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120804L.shtml

Robert Scheer Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120804W.shtml

Paul Krugman Inventing a Crisis
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120804X.shtml

Soldiers Sue: 'Army Keeps Us after Enlistment Ends'
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704B.shtml

Helen Thomas Declare Victory and Leave
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704F.shtml

Thomas L. Friedman 21st Century Fuel
http://www.truthout.org/environment.shtml

Le Nouvel Observateur Putin Denounces American "Dictatorship" in GuardedLanguage
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704H.shtml

Tom Engelhardt Icarus (Armed with Vipers) over Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704J.shtml

Dr. James J. Zogby A Day in the Park
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704L.shtml

******************************************************************************
The Unnecessary Death of Pat Tillman
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604Y.shtml

The Unnecessary Death of Pat Tillman, Part II
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120704X.shtml
******************************************************************************
Apocalypse Not Yet
by James K. Galbraith, TomPaine.com Exclusive
The world can't let America collapse...just yet. There is a way out, but will we find it in time? http://www.tompaine.com/articles/apocalypse_not_yet.php

Cleaning Up, One State At A Time
by Micah Sifry, TomPaine.com Exclusive
Think all politics is corrupted by money? What's happening in Maine and Arizona is going to change that. http://www.tompaine.com/articles/cleaning_up_one_state_at_a_time.php

Michael Scheuer Why I Resigned from the CIA
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604E.shtml

William O'Rourke GOP Prepares to Sink Teeth into Social Security
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604F.shtml

Bush Sets Out Plan to Dismantle 30 Years of Environmental Laws
http://www.truthout.org/environment.shtml

Daniel Cohen "It's Morality, You Fool!"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604H.shtml

Union Leader and Protégé Debate Labor's Direction
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604J.shtml

Harold Meyerson For Wal-Mart, Unions are Made in China, Too
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604K.shtml

Ann Woolner Election 2004 Is History. Questions Keep Coming
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604L.shtml

Ray McGovern All Mosquitos, No Swamp; No Elephants Either
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604X.shtml

LITTLE BIG MAN Amy Sullivan, Washington Monthly
Conservative columnist and pundit Bob Novak's privilegedposition would count for nothing if his peers andcolleagues held him accountable for his ethical lapses.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20663/

SEAFOOD FIGHT! Joshua Holland, AlterNet
The latest flap over Vietnamese seafood highlights thehypocrisy and corporate protectionism America exhibits inits trade relationships.
http://www.alternet.org/story/20667/

FLASHPOINT ISRAEL Jane Lampman, Christian Science Monitor
The Presbyterian Church votes to divest from companies doing business in Israel — and supporting the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza — and sets off a firestorm.
http://www.alternet.org/story/20671/
BATTLEFIELD EARTH Bill Moyers, AlterNet
The environment is in trouble and the religious rightdoesn't care. It's time to act as if the future depends on us – because it does.
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/20666/

UNEMBEDDED IN IRAQ Charles Shaw, Newtopia
This exclusive interview with un-embedded journalist Dahr Jamail reveals an almost unrecognizable picture of Iraq and its people
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20669/

Ownership Society

Ownership Society" by Dave Somers
The Rights new drum beat - they are promoting an "Ownership Society".
Great words. Who could be against that?
What it really means is privatizing social security, making every one buy their own health care, buy their way out of their poverty, buy their education. Forget public help for those that are disadvantaged.
Them that owns will get. Them that don't own are just failures and we needn't worry about them anyway, they "own" their own problems.
Got to hand it to the Cato Institute, they know how to create these neat concepts. http://www.cato.org/special/ownership_society/

Analysis Reveals Evidence of Election Fraud
“Red Shift” is a term used to describe the amount the 2004 tabulated presidential election results vary towards Bush from the last “un-corrected” exit poll published on the internet on election night, Nov. 2, 2004. Finding/ hypothesis: electoral fraud explains why the Red Shift phenomenon should be significantly greater in contested states, and, above all, why it should be dramatically greater, the more electoral college votes a contested state commands. Out of the 11 contested states, 10 had Red Shifts towards Bush. The electoral college votes represented by the five contested states with the greatest Red Shift was 82, whereas the electoral college votes represented by the five contested states with the least Red Shift was 43.
http://www.selftest.net/redshift.htm


US debt, the dollar, and Bush's plan for Social Security
The official philosophy of the government presided over by George W.Bush views the United States as standing outside of history --unfettered by traditional forces that dictate the rise and fall ofcivilizations and immune to the limits imposed on great powers by the broad sweep of historical trends.
According to this view, the United States is unique, and uniquely good, and constitutes a singular exception in the history of mankind.It can thus exercise its superior power unilaterally without worrying overly much about long-range consequences or the views of other nations. Never mind that "exceptionalism" requires a breath taking ethnocentrism; it is, quite simply, unsustainable in the context of aglobal market economy....
....Curently, the U.S. fiscal and trade deficit is about $600 billion, or 6 percent of gross domestic product. Virtually the entire deficit is structural, not related to cyclical economic ups and downs. Debt heldby foreigners totals $2.6 trillion, or 23 percent of GDP. Economistsat Goldman Sachs calculate that this figure will exceed 60 percent by 2020. Most of this debt is now held by foreign central banks in the form of Treasury bonds, as opposed to stocks held by privateinvestors.
The United States now is consuming three-quarters of the world's entire surplus savings. If the Bush plan for privatizing SocialSecurity becomes a reality, the transition cost will require either spending cuts (highly unlikely) or additional borrowing (more likely) of between $2 trillion and $3.6 trillion over the next 10 years. One immediate result of all this red ink is that the dollar has lost half its value relative to the euro since 2000 and some economists expect it to decline another 20 percent to 40 percent. Former Fed ChairmanPaul Volker recently stated there was a 75 percent chance of a currency crisis in the United States in the next five years....
Kenneth H. Torp of Seattle is a consultant in international publicfinance. He is also a retired U.S. foreign service officer.

Pentagon's Office of Strategic Influence (OSI)
A 1996 unofficial strategy paper written by an Army officer and published by the U.S. Naval War College ("Military Operations in the CNNWorld: Using the Media as a Force Multiplier") urged military commandersto find ways to "leverage the vast resources of the fourth estate" for the purposes of "communicating the [mission's] objective and endstate, boosting friendly morale, executing more effective psychologicaloperations, playing a major role in deception of the enemy, and enhancingintelligence collection." In February 2002, the New York Times reported that the Pentagon's Officeof Strategic Influence (OSI) was "developing plans to provide news items,possibly even false ones, to foreign media organizations" in an effort "to influence public sentiment and policy makers in both friendly and unfriendly countries."
In March 2000, FAIR and international news organizations revealed that CNN had allowed military propaganda specialists from an Army PSYOPS unit to work as interns in the news division of its Atlanta headquarters. CNN's Aaron Brown said, "There is an important and explicit bargain between the press and thePentagon in a time of war. We don't do anything to endanger the troops oroperations. They don't lie to us. Each is essential in a free society and each is made more complicated by the information age..."
http://www.fair.org/press-releases/cnn-psyops-fallujah.html

Bush's Rangers and Pioneers from Washington State

Name State Occupation Employer Industry Sector


John Connors WA Chief Financial Officer Microsoft Communications & Electronics Computers
Frank Dulcich WA President & CEO Pacific Seafood
Miscellaneous Business Food & Beverage


Jennifer Dunn WA Representative U.S. Congress
Other Civil Servants/Public Officials


John Kelly WA Attorney Microsoft Communications & Electronics
Computers


Susan McCaw WA President COM Investment Communications & Electronics
Telecommunications


Wayne M. Perry WA CEO Edge Wireless Communications & Technologies Telecommunications


http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/ContributorsAndPaybacks/pioneer_search.cfm

The Real News / Very Dirty Pictures

QUIET!!!!!!!!!!!! MEDIA SLEEPING

Quiet! Media Sleeping

One way to learn something about how media works – or doesn’t work – is to look at the use of certain words in news reports. As an example, let’s look at the word “quietly.”
In many cases, the word “quietly” is used in regard to the actions of public officials, and it makes sense. As in a December 5th article about U.S. relations with Brazil, in which the New York Times stated that “ Trade differences with Brazil...have been quietly patched up...” They mean (I guess) that these differences have been “patched up” behind the scenes, using diplomacy and private meetings and so forth. Do we need to know the details? Probably not, so that’s fine.
But often when you see the word “quietly” it is a clue that what you are reading is a rather stark, if indirect, admission by a media outlet of the fact that they have been sleeping on the job. The job, that is, of reporting important news. For example...
On October 23rd, the Star Tribune (Newspaper of the Twin Cities!) published an Associated Press (AP) story on the second page of the “Business” Section that used the word “quietly” as follows:
“President Bush showered $136 billion in new tax breaks on businesses, farmers and other groups Friday, quietly signing the most sweeping rewrite of corporate tax law in nearly two decades.”
Now, if it is true that this is “the most sweeping rewrite of corporate tax law in nearly two decades,” then isn’t it the job of the media to assure that it is not done “quietly?” True, as the Chinese Xinhua News Agency reported, “There was no ceremony for the bill-signing and President Bush made no comment on the new bill.” But all that means is that the President would like his signing of the bill to be “quiet,” presumably because he suspects – accurately, I hope – that most United Statesians would not approve of “showering” the wealthy with even more preferential tax treatment than they already get. His signature was affixed to this outrage, after all, about two weeks before the presidential election.
The reality is that such a scandal will only remain “quiet” if reporters and editors refuse to give prominence to a story that they, themselves, admit is a huge one. In this case, the entire story was pretty “quiet” in the nation’s press, with the New York Times devoting a total of two sentences to the bill in the month preceding the signing, despite numerous stories sent over the wires by Associated Press, among others, during that period.
Here’s another example. On the same day, October 23rd, the AP led off a different story like this: “More than 800 former soldiers have failed to comply with Army orders to get back in uniform and report for duty in Iraq or Afghanistan, the Army said Friday. That is more than one-third of the total who were told to report to a mobilization station by October 17.” The Army, reported the AP, “is trying to resolve these cases quietly.” (That’s the Star Trib’s edited version; the original AP story said, “the Army is going out of its way to resolve these cases as quietly as possible.” Interesting editing, eh?)
Again, it’s fairly easy to see why the Army might want to keep this evidence of dissatisfaction among the ranks with the two ongoing U.S. military occupations “quiet,” especially with their Commander-in-Chief up for election in a couple of weeks. But, again, isn’t it the media’s job to report on such things, regardless of the Army’s desire to keep it “quiet?”
So, remember: If a major piece of news is not widely known, the media have failed to do their job. And when the media themselves tell you that the people involved took some major action “quietly,” they are confessing to that failure.

Our Declining Moral Leadership

HUMAN RIGHTS
Our Declining Moral Leadership

Today is the 56th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States has long provided global leadership on human rights. Today, however, that influence is starting to wane. The Bush administration is sending mixed signals about its commitment to defending human rights at home and around the world. The White House is undermining America's moral authority, as more nations begin to see the United States as a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. Moral leadership starts at home.

SILENT WITNESS: According to the AP, Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel witnessed Abu Ghraib-style abuse against detainees at Guantanamo Bay as early as 2002. A newly released memo shows Thomas Harrington, the FBI's assistant director for counterterrorism, told the Pentagon that "he witnessed abuses as the leader of a team of FBI investigators that went to Cuba in 2002. It says that FBI agents witnessed at least three cases of 'highly aggressive interrogation techniques being used against detainees.'" It doesn't seem the FBI sounded the alarm. In Harrington's memo, he writes, "I have no record that our specific concerns regarding these three situations were communicated to the Department of Defense for appropriate action."

POST-ABU GHRAIB COVER-UP: Weeks after the abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq was publicly discovered, two Defense Department intelligence analysts witnessed new brutal treatment of prisoners in Iraq. Military investigators immediately tried to threaten the analysts into silence, warning them "not to talk to anyone" about the mistreatment they discovered. The intelligence analysts also had their e-mails monitored, their vehicle keys confiscated and were ordered not to leave the base without express permission. The White House tried to keep the June 25 memo documenting this under wraps, but was recently compelled to release it after a lawsuit was filed by the ACLU. The administration wants to "portray prisoner abuses as isolated events and the Pentagon's response as swift," and has "fought vigorously to keep the new documents from public view." As the Washington Post points out, there still is "no record…that makes clear whether the abuses…have stopped or whether anyone has been held responsible for them."

NOMINATION OF GONZALES: The White House has shown little interest in righting the wrongs of the abuse scandals or holding anyone responsible. Just last month, President Bush tapped Alberto Gonzales, the White House lawyer who was key in creating the policy which fostered the culture of abuse, to be the next attorney general. Gonzales was behind a Justice Department memo which included the opinion that laws prohibiting torture do "not apply to the President's detention and interrogation of enemy combatants." He also characterized the Geneva Conventions – the rules set in place to guarantee the humane, legal treatment of prisoners in war time – as "quaint." (For more on Gonzales's record on human rights, read this backgrounder.)

USING THE FRUITS OF TORTURE: Making matters worse, the administration believes that evidence gained by torture can be used by the U.S. military. For the past 70 years, statements produced under torture have been inadmissible in U.S. courts. According to Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Brian Boyle, however, U.S. military panels today "are allowed to use such evidence." Attorneys argued holding prisoners solely on evidence gained by torture "violated fundamental fairness and U.S. due process standards." Boyle's response? The detainees "have no constitutional rights enforceable in this court."

GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: A new memo by the Center for American Progress outlines nine critical areas in which the United States must take leadership in promoting human rights abroad. For example, the Bush administration has been reluctant to criticize Russian President Vladimir Putin, counting him as a close ally even as he supports brutal methods of fighting terrorism in Chechnya and backs a rigged election in the Ukraine. The White House also has yet to seriously censure Saudi Arabia, ignoring reports of "unlawful executions, arrests, torture and censorship." Most egregiously, the Bush administration has not provided leadership in ending the genocide in Sudan.


How We Work

http://rodcorp.typepad.com/rodcorp/2004/12/how_we_work.html
[A nifty and eclectic collection. Some excerpts]

Paul Valéry, poet wrote some poetry and prose in his early twenties and then paused to take twenty years off to study his mental processes. After being encouraged by friends, he finally returned to poetry and in six years produced the three volumes that made his name.

Entrepreneur Ricardo Semler's anti-Taylorist methods at Semco may seem nutty (you can choose your own salary and manager, everyone can see the company financial accounts), but apparently they work. Semco's staff work in small, autonomous units of about a dozen (the size, says Semler, of a close family group). They make the decisions, choose their leaders, set objectives and decide who they need and what they should be paid: someone who wants too much pay for what they are doing might be frozen out by the group. "From a distance it can sound like a workers' paradise," says Semler, "but the system is pretty unforgiving, because if you put your salary too high, and people don't put you on the list as someone they need for the next six months, you're in more trouble than you would be at General Motors. There is little bureaucratic control beyond financial accountability; almost everything depends on peer pressure. . .

Author Phillip Roth stands while he's working, and "walks half a mile for every page". Like others, Roth has a strict regime: He works standing up, paces around while he's thinking and has said he walks half a mile for every page he writes. . .

Scott McNealy, entrepreneur: In 1997, McNealy banned the use of Powerpoint at Sun because it clogged disks, bandwidth and brains: "We had 12.9 gigabytes of Powerpoint slides in storage on our disk drives. Ha ha ha. It freaks me out just to think about. Do you how many person centuries that is? Of clip-art manipulations? I banned Powerpoint from our company - I just edicted it. . . If I just gave everybody overheads, you know, blank Mila overheads with all the free pens they wanted - I could drive productivity through the roof, as opposed to having - I mean you've all seen these overheads that have 14 pieces of clipart, 13 fonts, right hand justified, spell-check, 13 colors and you know your employee is exhausted by the time it finally comes off the printer. And do they communicate anything? No."

Jackson Pollock knocked a wall down in his studio in order to fit in the canvas that would become Mural (1943), for Peggy Guggenheim's apartment. But he didn't commence work on it until 15 hours before it was due to be delivered - "it was a stampede", he would later report. When it was delivered, Guggenheim found that it was eight inches too long to fit into the space. On Marcel Duchamp's advise it was chopped down to fit.