737 hit the south tower, not a 767 the smoking Guns of the 9-11 conspiracy
The street engine was identified as a CFM56, the sole powerplant of the Boeing 737 after the 737-200 series. HOWEVER, UA175 that was alleged to have crashed into the South Tower was a Boeing 767-200. http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm
(Jeff) Rense.com has not only provided actual photographs (see photos at: http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm ) of one of the engines from a Boeing 737, NOT a 767 as offered by "our" government, but has reinforced that photographic evidence with a realistic explanation from a government-trained aviation expert. COL. George Nelson (ret) (see his remarks below) graphically and in detail explains that aircraft parts, all of them, are identified by serial numbers that are then tied into the main serial number of the aircraft itself. And the photo of the engine shows, when compared to the downed "Murray Street" sign, and with a carpenter's square inserted in the compressor fan area, that it is a small jet engine, which could never have come from a large Boeing 767 airliner.
http://www.rense.com/general65/act.htm
During his Air Force carreer, COL. George Nelson duties included being an aircraft maintenance officers are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at the University of Southern California. In addition to my direct participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air Forces during the height of the Vietnam conflict.
"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft... (Aircraft) parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling."
American Airlines Flight 11: (flew into the WTC)
Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.
American Airlines Flight 77:
This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.
Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce aerial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged.
http://www.rense.com/general64/prec.htm
Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower
Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., ran across the video footage in a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.
Who is Karl W. B. Schwarz. He is President, Chief Executive OfficerPatmos Nanotechnologies, LLC. Has a website: http://www.karlschwarz.com/ and is author of the book, One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas. Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute, 52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737 airliner striking the south tower.“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to prove its authenticity.“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11 is untrue.”Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767. However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.“Not even two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz.
Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:• Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.• Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the Middle East. “Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/one-time_gop_insider.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
------------------------
Pentagon Jet Engine Identified,
A JT8D engine was identified in the Pentagon crash debris. HOWEVER, a JT8D engine is NOT the powerplant the Flight 77, which was a Boeing 757 that is reported to have struck the Pentagon. http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
February 2, 2005.....The post-attack cleanup at the Pentagon shed some light on the fact that it was not a 757, but exactly what the part recovered was has not been easy to find or locate.
It is not a "turbofan" component, it is in fact a "turbojet" component from an US Air Force/Navy vintage type of jet engine technology that was used on just a limited number of fighters, bombers and reconnaissance planes.
There was one credible witness found that saw "a two-engine jet airplane, the engines were under the wings." That is a visual description of a 737, 757, or 767, but it is also a description of an A-3 Skywarrior.
The USAF only has a few of the A-3s left in operation.
See jet engine photos at: http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
////// What has been interesting is the level of "content blocking" that there is on the Internet where specific information regarding certain "jet engine components" such as those shown at the Pentagon have definitely been blocked. Our team had to take steps to go around the content blocks to get at the photos you are seeing regarding these rotor hub components.
That part has a specific UPN (Universal Part Number) and it cannot be found by looking for that UPN. Other measures were needed to find what you are seeing in these photos to circumvent what is apparently intentional content blocking. Someone has gone to considerable lengths to make sure that the actual components that were found at the Pentagon could not be found and it took my team over two years to hammer through such blocks to find three of these photos (Praxair and Evergreen) to verify the component.
------------------------------
The impact damage to the Pentagon does not match up with the dementions of a 757 jet of 125 foot wingspan. It is much smaller. Like a A-3 Skywarrior. See the pictures and graphs at:
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=834
MEDIA RELEASES FAKED PHOTOGRAPHS OF 9/11 PENTAGON EXPLOSION
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=322
Conclusions:
The hole in the Pentagon wall appears to have been made by an aircraft, however, the hole is too small to have been made by a Boeing 757.
The damage to the Pentagon is about as extensive as one would expect from the crash of a large aircraft, although one that was somewhat smaller than a Boeing 757.
The public has absolutely no evidence that Boeing 757 debris has been recovered from the site.
The photos of "the explosion" of flight 77 are a complete and utter fabrication.
The object that hit the pentagon did not strike it a 45 degrees as reported.
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=652
Comment: The 9-11 hijackings has the same conspriacy unwrapping as did the Kennedy assassinations. Little by little the evidence of a government conspriacy is unfolding, as in the majetic bullet theory! Here are some more of the details of this evidence.
Other facts that lead to big questions of conspiracy:
A small white jet airplane and a helicopter were photographed in the area of the WTC during the two crashes, both did not have identifcation markings: http://www.rense.com/general64/prec.htm
Andreas von Bulow, former Defense Secretary and former head of technology, Department of Technology in Germany and he's just written a best selling book 9-11 and the CIA,
The owner of the World Trade Center slipped up on TV and said that they blew (WRC) Building Seven up. The forty-seven story building that wasn't even hit by an aircraft.
the PBS documentary America Rebuilding,, where they admit they blew up WTC 7. Now, that's important because they said that building fell from fire even though it wasn't hit by a plane. And now, he slips up and says we decided to demolish it on 9-11, but then the mainstream media just ignores that. This is a public admission.
The seismographs at geological institutions in five states showed that multiple explosions occurred, and the spikes of 2.2 on the Richter scale prove it must have been explosions. The firefighters were told to get back (before it fell down).
-----------
The CIA headquarters in New York was in, was within this WTC number seven building. The emergency center for the governor, the major, err, mayor was (in this building).
The CIA was running a drill 15 miles from the World Trade Center that day of flying jets into buildings in New York and DC. Internal sources inside the Pentagon, the lawyers who represent them have said they were told to stand down because it was quote, " just a drill".
----------
You,ve got the FBI paying for the houses, the cars, the credit cards of the supposed hijackers. I mean, sir, you start- you,ve got public officials, Mayor Willie Brown, Joint Chiefs of Staff told not to fly to New York that day.
---------
At the beginning the engineers weren't allowed to go up to the steel truss [debris] (of the WTC).
----------------
Anthrax being a psychological cover-up of the (media's news) scenery. That is, all these questions coming out in the early days about 9-11 got blacked out by the anthrax attacks and that's absolutely why that happened. the Anthrax bacteria was tracked back to Fort Detrick, Maryland. And they said it wasn't weaponized anthrax, it turned out it was the most weaponized ever seen.
Comment: A disinformation method using information over-load of the evening TV news.
--------------
Fights against terrorism, the war against Afghanistan to put out the Taliban was decided long before and in about June before 9-11. The Pakistan government and the Indian government [were] told there would be an intervention in October.
Some 44 000 US troops were moved into position near Afghanistan area, 18 000 US troops were in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
Bush had the battle launch orders on his desk two days before 9-11.
The CIA and insider trading:
The insider trading, everybody knows that there [was] news about insider trading. Possibly some fifteen billion dollars. And, there was speculation about going down, of United Airlines and American Airlines; both airlines which were attacked by 9-11 and other things. So, normally you could find out because I think the American- the CIA together with the financial department, the Treasury, they developed this watching the markets to find out speculation about going on terrorist attacks. So, they could immediately find out if there were something going on- and they could find out. And, in this case, they- 9-11- the NSA people which are the guys watching via satellites the whole of the (all banking wire transfers) transactions going on, on Earth, they said, they told the people to destroy the tapes. They had tapes about this interior trading and they said they had to destroy them so they are not any longer proof.
Record put options against United and American; not against other airlines but specifically against these and it leads back to the CIA and suddenly they destroy the evidence.
-------------
OklahomaCity bomb:
There is an American general, an Air Force general who for I think ten years or fifteen years in charge of this explosive institute and he said never could this agrarian bomb bring about such damage. There must be something else and they found that within the building there were demolition charges.
http://www.rense.com/general65/aj.htm
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose
(Jeff) Rense.com has not only provided actual photographs (see photos at: http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm ) of one of the engines from a Boeing 737, NOT a 767 as offered by "our" government, but has reinforced that photographic evidence with a realistic explanation from a government-trained aviation expert. COL. George Nelson (ret) (see his remarks below) graphically and in detail explains that aircraft parts, all of them, are identified by serial numbers that are then tied into the main serial number of the aircraft itself. And the photo of the engine shows, when compared to the downed "Murray Street" sign, and with a carpenter's square inserted in the compressor fan area, that it is a small jet engine, which could never have come from a large Boeing 767 airliner.
http://www.rense.com/general65/act.htm
During his Air Force carreer, COL. George Nelson duties included being an aircraft maintenance officers are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at the University of Southern California. In addition to my direct participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air Forces during the height of the Vietnam conflict.
"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft... (Aircraft) parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling."
American Airlines Flight 11: (flew into the WTC)
Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.
American Airlines Flight 77:
This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.
Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce aerial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged.
http://www.rense.com/general64/prec.htm
Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower
Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., ran across the video footage in a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.
Who is Karl W. B. Schwarz. He is President, Chief Executive OfficerPatmos Nanotechnologies, LLC. Has a website: http://www.karlschwarz.com/ and is author of the book, One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas. Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute, 52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737 airliner striking the south tower.“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to prove its authenticity.“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11 is untrue.”Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767. However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.“Not even two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz.
Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:• Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.• Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the Middle East. “Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/one-time_gop_insider.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
------------------------
Pentagon Jet Engine Identified,
A JT8D engine was identified in the Pentagon crash debris. HOWEVER, a JT8D engine is NOT the powerplant the Flight 77, which was a Boeing 757 that is reported to have struck the Pentagon. http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
February 2, 2005.....The post-attack cleanup at the Pentagon shed some light on the fact that it was not a 757, but exactly what the part recovered was has not been easy to find or locate.
It is not a "turbofan" component, it is in fact a "turbojet" component from an US Air Force/Navy vintage type of jet engine technology that was used on just a limited number of fighters, bombers and reconnaissance planes.
There was one credible witness found that saw "a two-engine jet airplane, the engines were under the wings." That is a visual description of a 737, 757, or 767, but it is also a description of an A-3 Skywarrior.
The USAF only has a few of the A-3s left in operation.
See jet engine photos at: http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
////// What has been interesting is the level of "content blocking" that there is on the Internet where specific information regarding certain "jet engine components" such as those shown at the Pentagon have definitely been blocked. Our team had to take steps to go around the content blocks to get at the photos you are seeing regarding these rotor hub components.
That part has a specific UPN (Universal Part Number) and it cannot be found by looking for that UPN. Other measures were needed to find what you are seeing in these photos to circumvent what is apparently intentional content blocking. Someone has gone to considerable lengths to make sure that the actual components that were found at the Pentagon could not be found and it took my team over two years to hammer through such blocks to find three of these photos (Praxair and Evergreen) to verify the component.
------------------------------
The impact damage to the Pentagon does not match up with the dementions of a 757 jet of 125 foot wingspan. It is much smaller. Like a A-3 Skywarrior. See the pictures and graphs at:
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=834
MEDIA RELEASES FAKED PHOTOGRAPHS OF 9/11 PENTAGON EXPLOSION
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=322
Conclusions:
The hole in the Pentagon wall appears to have been made by an aircraft, however, the hole is too small to have been made by a Boeing 757.
The damage to the Pentagon is about as extensive as one would expect from the crash of a large aircraft, although one that was somewhat smaller than a Boeing 757.
The public has absolutely no evidence that Boeing 757 debris has been recovered from the site.
The photos of "the explosion" of flight 77 are a complete and utter fabrication.
The object that hit the pentagon did not strike it a 45 degrees as reported.
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=652
Comment: The 9-11 hijackings has the same conspriacy unwrapping as did the Kennedy assassinations. Little by little the evidence of a government conspriacy is unfolding, as in the majetic bullet theory! Here are some more of the details of this evidence.
Other facts that lead to big questions of conspiracy:
A small white jet airplane and a helicopter were photographed in the area of the WTC during the two crashes, both did not have identifcation markings: http://www.rense.com/general64/prec.htm
Andreas von Bulow, former Defense Secretary and former head of technology, Department of Technology in Germany and he's just written a best selling book 9-11 and the CIA,
The owner of the World Trade Center slipped up on TV and said that they blew (WRC) Building Seven up. The forty-seven story building that wasn't even hit by an aircraft.
the PBS documentary America Rebuilding,, where they admit they blew up WTC 7. Now, that's important because they said that building fell from fire even though it wasn't hit by a plane. And now, he slips up and says we decided to demolish it on 9-11, but then the mainstream media just ignores that. This is a public admission.
The seismographs at geological institutions in five states showed that multiple explosions occurred, and the spikes of 2.2 on the Richter scale prove it must have been explosions. The firefighters were told to get back (before it fell down).
-----------
The CIA headquarters in New York was in, was within this WTC number seven building. The emergency center for the governor, the major, err, mayor was (in this building).
The CIA was running a drill 15 miles from the World Trade Center that day of flying jets into buildings in New York and DC. Internal sources inside the Pentagon, the lawyers who represent them have said they were told to stand down because it was quote, " just a drill".
----------
You,ve got the FBI paying for the houses, the cars, the credit cards of the supposed hijackers. I mean, sir, you start- you,ve got public officials, Mayor Willie Brown, Joint Chiefs of Staff told not to fly to New York that day.
---------
At the beginning the engineers weren't allowed to go up to the steel truss [debris] (of the WTC).
----------------
Anthrax being a psychological cover-up of the (media's news) scenery. That is, all these questions coming out in the early days about 9-11 got blacked out by the anthrax attacks and that's absolutely why that happened. the Anthrax bacteria was tracked back to Fort Detrick, Maryland. And they said it wasn't weaponized anthrax, it turned out it was the most weaponized ever seen.
Comment: A disinformation method using information over-load of the evening TV news.
--------------
Fights against terrorism, the war against Afghanistan to put out the Taliban was decided long before and in about June before 9-11. The Pakistan government and the Indian government [were] told there would be an intervention in October.
Some 44 000 US troops were moved into position near Afghanistan area, 18 000 US troops were in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
Bush had the battle launch orders on his desk two days before 9-11.
The CIA and insider trading:
The insider trading, everybody knows that there [was] news about insider trading. Possibly some fifteen billion dollars. And, there was speculation about going down, of United Airlines and American Airlines; both airlines which were attacked by 9-11 and other things. So, normally you could find out because I think the American- the CIA together with the financial department, the Treasury, they developed this watching the markets to find out speculation about going on terrorist attacks. So, they could immediately find out if there were something going on- and they could find out. And, in this case, they- 9-11- the NSA people which are the guys watching via satellites the whole of the (all banking wire transfers) transactions going on, on Earth, they said, they told the people to destroy the tapes. They had tapes about this interior trading and they said they had to destroy them so they are not any longer proof.
Record put options against United and American; not against other airlines but specifically against these and it leads back to the CIA and suddenly they destroy the evidence.
-------------
OklahomaCity bomb:
There is an American general, an Air Force general who for I think ten years or fifteen years in charge of this explosive institute and he said never could this agrarian bomb bring about such damage. There must be something else and they found that within the building there were demolition charges.
http://www.rense.com/general65/aj.htm
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose
posted by T. Scott Brineman at 6:49 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home