Thursday, January 26, 2006

What they don't want you to know about the coming oil crisis


Jan 20, 2006 -- Almost everywhere geologists have looked - which
means everywhere by now, at least at some level of exploration -
there is no oil because one or more of the key geological
requirements is missing, (for example source rock) . Only one well
drilled in every 10 finds oil. Only one in a hundred finds an
important oilfield. And the more wells that are drilled in a
province or country, the smaller the oilfields generally tend to
become.

"We've looked around the world many times. I'd say there is no North
Sea out there. There certainly isn't a Saudi Arabia."

In February 2005, Matthew Simmons speculated that the Saudis may
have damaged their giant oilfields by over-producing them in the
past: a geological phenomenon known as "rate sensitivity". In
oilfields where the oil is pumped too hard, the structure of the oil
reservoir can be impaired. In bad cases, most of a field's oil can
be left stranded below ground, essentially unextractable. "If Saudi
Arabia has damaged its fields, accidentally or not," Simmons
said, "then we may already have passed peak oil."

Chris Skrebowski believes that, from as early as 2007, the volumes
of new oil production are likely to fall short of the combined need
to replace lost capacity from depleting older fields and to satisfy
continued growth in demand. In fact, given the time frames with
which offshore oilfields are developed and depleted, it seems
certain that there will be nowhere near enough oil to meet the
combined forces of depletion and demand between 2008 and 2012. If
there were, it would be from projects we would know about today (oil
companies liking as they do to boast to their shareholders about
every sizeable discovery). Given the inevitable time-lag from
discovery to production, there is now no way to plug that gap.

There is worse: people in the oil industry must know this. They
should be alerting governments and consumers to the inevitability of
an energy crunch, and they aren't.

"The perception of looming decline may be worse than the decline
itself," Campbell said. "There will be panic. The market overreacts
to even small imbalances. Prices are set to soar in the absence of
spare capacity until demand is cut by recessions. We will enter a
volatile epoch of price shocks and recessions in increasingly
vicious circles. A stock-market crash is inevitable."

"If the economic recovery continues," Skrebowski added, "supply
will get very tight from 2008 or 2009. Prices will soar. There is
very little time and lots of heads are in the sand."

Oil in the Caspian (an oil field maybe the size of North Sea) is
central to every scenario that envisages oil supply meeting demand
off into the 2020s. The oil industry has long regarded the Baku-
Ceyhan pipeline from Azerbaijan to Turkey . Turkey has had 17 major
shocks in the past 80 years, and the pipeline is supposed to last
for 40 years.

As for competition over diminishing supplies: The Pentagon
established a Central Command in 1983, one of five unified commands
around the world, with the clear task of protecting the global flow
of petroleum. "Slowly but surely," Michael Klare concludes, "the US
military is being converted into a global oil-protection service."

Beyond the Middle East Five, the Bush strategy of supplier
diversification will look to eight main sources, which Klare calls
the Alternative Eight: Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Russia,
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Nigeria and Angola. These countries and
their oil operations are characterised by one or more of the
following attributes: corruption, organised crime, civil war,
political turmoil short of civil war, and ruthless dictators. The US
military is being forced into deeper relationships with such
regimes, including joint military exercises.

The bottom line for Klare is this. "Any eruption of ethnic or
political violence in these areas could do more than entrap our
forces there. It could lead to a deadly confrontation between the
world's military powers." Because obviously, in a world as
enduringly addicted to oil as ours is, others are going to be
looking for their own supplies. Russia and China will be among them.

http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article339928.ece

Adapted from Half Gone: Oil, Gas, Hot Air and the Global Energy
Crisis, by Jeremy Leggett, published by Portobello Books.

-----------

(In addition:) emerging shortages of several major industrial
commodities including cement, steel, and (perhaps most importantly)
copper – the essential ingredient of electrical transmission lines.
Then there is the problem of compound growth or the fact that at
current growth rates within two decades (2026) there will be as many
internal combustion powered vehicles in China as there are on the
entire planet today (with very relaxed emission control standards).
Cal Tech Vice Chancellor David Goodstein in 2003 that it takes 30
years to replace an energy infrastructure even if a solution is
found.

Michael Ruppert

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012306_world_stories.shtml#
1

New Study Raises Questions About Sustainability Of Metal Resources

Researchers studying supplies of copper, zinc and other metals have
determined that these finite resources, even if recycled, may not
meet the needs of the global population forever. According to the
study, if all nations were to use the same services enjoyed in
developed nations, even the full extraction of metals from the
Earth's crust and extensive recycling programs may not meet future
demand.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060123122555.htm

Iran's Bourse, the Dollar and "Pre-emptive" War
We all know (hopefully) from reading Dr. Gordon Prather 3 times a
week here at Antiwar.com and World Net Daily (and even from rags
like the Washington Post) that if the government of Iran began to
enrich uranium for nuclear bomb making purposes right now, it would
take them 10 years to make one simple gun-type nuke (Prather's term)
(and nevermind the delivery system). In other words, all the hype
about some imminent nuclear danger is a pack of lies.

Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D., the great witness to the Office of Special
Plans, has said repeatedly that she believes one of the principal
reasons for the invasion of Iraq was that in the year 2000 Saddam
Hussein had begun demanding Euros instead of dollars as payment
for "his" oil.

Now there is this incredible article by Krassimir Petrov, Ph.D.,
along the lines of Dr. Prather's piece this weekend speculating that
the reason the neocons and the Israeli government keep asserting
Iran will have nukes and require bombing by March is because they
are about to open a new oil and gas exchange - the Iranian Bourse,
and will be demanding payment in Euros.

This is bad news for the US dollar because the Saudis et al. demand
dollars for their oil and the powers of the Earth must therefore
hold large amounts of US currency. Iran, a state run by people who
for some reason aren't happy with us, plan to demand Euros in their
new exchange. That could lead to the government banks of the world
to diversify their holdings and a flooding of the US with our
government's paper money that has been held in those foreign
accounts. Then comes inflation - bad inflation.

The War Party may have decided that the time is now for pushing the
nuke program lie and striking while the getting's good.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P2608

http://www.countercurrents.org/us-petrov200106.htm

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY
NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this
article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the
originator.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose

or the best of N&V at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsviewsnolose2

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyDemocratCaucusWA/

Suitable for Framing?


By Peter Teague, AlterNet. Posted January 26, 2006.


True reframing means letting go of the thinking behind the multimillion-dollar institutions on which many of us depend for a living.

It's a funny thing about the term "framing:" The more it gets used, the less we seem to understand what it means. Three years after George Lakoff emerged from academia to help make framing a household word among progressive activists, most of us are now thoroughly confused about what a frame is, or how to distinguish a frame from a slogan, message or spin. Consider this recent teaser for AlterNet's new blog, Echo Chamber:

Some current frames: The president broke the law by authorizing spying; this Republican Congress is the most corrupt in history; Alito is an extremist judge who will set the country back decades and can still be defeated. Are these frames working? Are they the right message? Stay tuned to the Echo Chamber to find out.

More accurate questions would have been: Are these frames? Are they messages? Is there a difference?

What we learned from Lakoff early on is that framing begins at a deep conceptual level. It is really about how we understand the world and our place in it; how we define problems and solutions; how we organize ourselves to achieve our goals; and how we talk about all of it.

Despite attempts to fight the tide, framing has come to mean finding better words and images to communicate with various audiences (the president broke the law by authorizing spying). The problem (and I think it's serious), is that we're proposing "frames" that are actually messages within frames, that evoke frames of which we remain oblivious. In the name of fixing a problem (we don't have a clue what the frames are in which we're operating) we're actually perpetuating it.

I think getting this right matters, because what framing really points us to is a deep rethink that forces us to challenge our assumptions and identities and that will require a reorganization of many of our efforts. It is not sloganeering, messaging or spinning, all of which leave our assumptions, identities and institutions comfortably in place.

Genuine re-framing is the hard work that progressives will have to do if we are to have any hope of offering a serious challenge to right-wing domination of American politics. It is the work that must precede message framing: Message framing without deep conceptual reframes is like hanging pictures in a house in New Orleans' Lower Ninth Ward right now. Without exposing the mold and the rot, taking things down to the foundations where necessary, and then framing new walls, windows and doors, we're not going to build a home that will last.

What will this hard work involve? For starters we'll need to identify and then question some of our underlying core assumptions. A prime example: The assumption that we can build an effective counterweight to conservative and corporate hegemony from the conglomeration of several different issue or identity-based "movements."

We now have decades of experience with this theory -- that if each issue movement does a good job, then it will all come together in some bright tomorrow. But despite the massive growth of progressive "civil society," we're no closer to the birth of a genuine movement than we were 25 years ago. Only by exposing the fallacy will we be free to think differently, to focus on articulating our goals in terms of shared American values, to be explicit about building a majoritarian movement.

There has never been any illusion that any of the academic theorizing about framing made sense without organizations and leaders who could do the real work of reframing. But this gets very tough, because if we do this right, it has to mean challenging basic assumptions about what the problems and solutions are, and this may in turn demand radical rethinking of our organizations and alliances.

For example, we might be less sanguine about leaving the issue of global warming to the environmental experts if, instead of understanding it in terms of too much carbon in the atmosphere, we thought about it in terms of solutions, including:

  • The potential for a transition to a clean energy economy.
  • The creation of millions of high-skill, high-wage jobs.
  • Taking responsibility for our common future.
  • Developing and sharing new technologies with the developing world.
  • The transformative effects of energy democracy versus energy domination.

To suggest a genuine reframe inevitably means we'd actually have to think about letting go, not just of identities, but also the thinking behind multimillion-dollar institutions on which many of us depend for a living. This is why I think most of the mainstream reframing efforts now under way will stop well short of what's needed. The framing experts have proven unwilling or unable to lay out the unvarnished truth about what's at stake, and even if they did, our large institutional leaders won't, and probably can't, make the kind of changes necessary; they may have too much invested in the status quo to be the change we want to see in the world.

This will leave the real work to those on the margins, where change usually takes place. And this is exactly where it's happening. For example, the best of the metro advocacy and organizing groups are challenging the narrow confines of traditional issue categories. They are working on the things that are of primary concern to their communities and developing broader visions of what those communities can be. They're bringing labor, community and faith groups together and linking up to build real power in some of the largest states. These organizations don't need framing experts to urge them to let go and move on. They're operating in new and effective ways without needing to do a lot of explaining (other than to funders, who remain a problem); it just makes sense.

While the mainstream groups and their consultants seek to contrast "conventional frames" and "new frames" within each traditional issue category, the best of the new work turns the tables: Forget the categories, focus on cross-cutting solutions that appeal to broad audiences, and then begin to build a bigger movement by bringing together folks who are open to busting out. This is genuine reframing, in my understanding, as opposed to setting out new policy proposals or messages within the existing categories.

This all points to the possibility of a new movement that will manage the alchemy that has eluded us for so long: to be greater than the sum of our parts. We can't underestimate the magnitude or the challenges involved in what we're trying to accomplish. And I'm convinced that we make it infinitely more difficult if we fail, at the outset, to challenge our assumptions, beliefs and identities. Only then will we be able to build a new politics in which environmental, social and economic justice activists, business people, civil rights organizers, health care reformers, children's advocates, labor unionists, peace campaigners, veterans and all the rest of us will find a home.

This is what framing really needs to be about for progressives: bringing these elements and elements we haven't even imagined yet into a new movement that includes us and transcends us.

Peter Teague is a program officer at the Nathan Cummings Foundation. The nonprofit Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's institutional parent, receives funding from the Foundation.

FIRST WINTER OLYMPICS:

With the Winter Olympics coming up I thought that this bit of historical background was appropriate.........Enjoy the games.................PEACE................Scott

January 25, 1924

On January 25, 1924, the first Winter Olympics take off in style at Chamonix in
the French Alps. Spectators were thrilled by the ski jump and bobsled as well as
12 other events involving a total of six sports. The "International Winter
Sports Week," as it was known, was a great success, and in 1928 the
International Olympic Committee (IOC) officially designated the Winter Games,
staged in St. Moritz, Switzerland, as the second Winter Olympics.Five years
after the birth of the modern Olympics in 1896, the first organized
international competition involving winter sports was staged in Sweden. Called
the Nordic Games, only Scandinavian countries competed. Like the Olympics, it
was staged thereon every four years but always in Sweden. In 1908, figure
skating made its way into the Summer Olympics in London, though it was not
actually held until October, some three months after the other events were
over.In 1911, the IOC proposed the staging of a separate winter competition for
the 1912 Stockholm Games, but Sweden, wanting to protect the popularity of the
Nordic Games, declined. Germany planned a Winter Olympics to precede the 1916
Berlin Summer Games, but World War I forced the cancellation of both. At the
1920 Olympics in Antwerp, Belgium, ice hockey joined figure skating as an
official Olympic event, and Canada took home the first of many hockey gold
medals. Soon after, an agreement was reached with Scandinavians to stage the
IOC-sanctioned International Winter Sports Week. It was so popular among the 16
participating nations that, in 1925, the IOC formally created the Winter
Olympics, retroactively making Chamonix the first.In Chamonix, Scandinavians
dominated the speed rinks and slopes, and Norway won the unofficial team
competition with 17 medals. The United States came in third, winning its only
gold medal with Charles Jewtraw's victory in the 500-meter speed-skating event.
Canada won another hockey gold, scoring 110 goals and allowing just three goals
in five games. Of the nearly 300 athletes, only 13 were women, and they only
competed in the figure-skating events. Austrian Helene Engelmann won the pairs
competition with Alfred Berger, and Austrian Herma Planck Szabo won the women's
singles. The Olympics offered a particular boost to skiing, a sport that would
make enormous strides within the next decade. At Chamonix, Norway won all but
one of the nine skiing medals.

Saturday, October 01, 2005

NOT SO NEW BLOG

"I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore"

A great quote but a little over the top for the way that I feel concerning this blog. My frustartion has gotten the better of me though and I'm ready to move. I've established a new blog and here is the address.

http://crap713two.blogspot.com/

Come see me for the same old "CRAP" that you've come to know and love so well!!!

So I say goodbye to "CRAPI" and hello to "CRAPII"

I didn't realize that blogs had sunset clauses............LOL...........PEACE................Scott

Subj: On the front line

Subj: On the front line
>
> +++++++++
> "A friend of my cousins who's a Physician in NO, sent this to him and
> asked
> to pass it on to all who want to know what's really going on down there.
> Note
> there are many typos and misspellings. I know he's
> exhausted...........Audley"
>
> *******
> (this is now the physician writing.....)
>
> "Thanks to all of you who have sent your notes of concern and your
> prayers.
> I am writing this note on Tuesday at 2PM . I wanted to update all of you
> as
> to the situation here. I don't know how much information you are getting
> but I am certain it is more than we are getting. Be advised that almost
> everything I am telling you is from direct observation or rumor from
> reasonable
> sources. They are allowing limited internet access, so I hope to send
> this
> dispatch today.
>
> Personally, my family and I are fine. My family is safe in Jackson, MS,
> and I am now a temporary resident of the Ritz Carleton Hotel in New
> Orleans. I
> figured if it was my time to go, I wanted to go in a place with a good
> wine
> list. In addition, this hotel is in a very old building on Canal Street
> that
> could and did sustain little damage. Many of the other hotels sustained
> significant loss of windows, and we expect that many of the guests may
> be
> evacuated here.
>
> Things were obviously bad yesterday, but they are much worse today.
> Overnight the water arrived. Now Canal Street (true to its origins) is
> indeed a
> canal. The first floor of all downtown buildings is underwater. I have
> heard
> that Charity Hospital and Tulane are limited in their ability to care for
> patients because of water. Ochsner is the only hospital that remains
> fully
> functional. However, I spoke with them today and they too are on
> generator and
> losing food and water fast. The city now has no clean water, no sewerage
> system,
> no electricity, and no real communications. Bodies are still being
> recovered floating in the floods. We are worried about a cholera
> epidemic. Even the
> police are without effective communications. We have a group of armed
> police here with us at the hotel that are admirably trying to exert some
> local law enforcement. This is tough because looting is now rampant.
> Most of
> it is not malicious looting. These are poor and desperate people with no
> housing and no medical care and no food or water trying to take care of
> themselves and their families. Unfortunately, the people are armed and
> dangerous.
> We hear gunshots frequently. Most of Canal street is occupied by armed
> looters who have a low threshold for discharging their weapons. We hear
> gunshots frequently. The looters are using makeshift boats made of
> pieces of
> styrofoam to access. We are still waiting for a significant national
> guard
> presence.
>
> The health care situation here has dramatically worsened overnight.
> Many
> people in the hotel are elderly and small children. Many other guests
> have
> unusual diseases. They are unfortunately . 'We have better medical
> letter.
> There are ID physicians in at this hotel attending an HiV convention.
> We
> have commandeered the world famous French Quarter Bar to turn into a
> makeshift
> clinic. There is a team of about 7 doctors and PA and pharmacists. We
> anticipate that this will be the major medical facility in the central
> business
> district and French Quarter.
>
> Our biggest adventure today was raiding the Walgreens on Canal under
> police
> escort. The pharmacy was dark and full of water. We basically scooped
> the
> entire drug sets into gargace bags and removed them. All uner police
> excort.
> The looters had to be held back at gun point. After a dose of
> prophylactic Cipro I hope to be fine.
>
> In all we are faring well. We have set up a hospital in the the French
> Quarter bar in the hotel, and will start admitting patients today. Many
> with be
> from the hotel, but many will not. We are anticipating to dealing with
> multiple medical problems, medications and and acute injuries. Infection
> and
> perhaps even cholera are anticipated major problems. Food and water
> shortages
> are iminent.
>
> The biggest question to all of us is where is the national guard. We
> hear
> jet fignters and helicopters, but no real armed presence, and hence the
> rampant looting. There is no Red Cross and no salvation army.
>
> In a sort of cliché way, this is an edifying experience. One is rapidly
> focused away from the transient and material to the bare necessities of
> life.
> It has been challenging to me to learn how to be a primary care
> phyisican.
> We are under martial law so return to our homes is impossible. I don't
> know how long it will be and this is my greatest fear. Despite it all,
> this is
> a soul edify experience. The greatest pain is to think about the loss.
> And how long the rebuid will. And the horror of so many dead people .
>
> PLEASE SEND THIS DISPATCH TO ALL YOU THING MA Y BE INTERSTED IN A
> DISPATCH From the front. I will send more according to your interest.
> Hopefully
> their collective prayers will be answered. By the way suture packs,
> sterile
> gloves and stethoscopes will be needed as the Ritz turns into a MASH
>
> Greg Henderson, MD "
> ++++++++

THE PROGRESS REPORT

by Judd Legum, Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, and Christy Harvey

September 2, 2005

VALUES
The Forsaken

ADMINISTRATION
Incompetent Response

UNDER THE RADAR
Go Beyond The Headlines

For news and updates throughout the day, check out our blog at ThinkProgress.org.
Sign up | Contact us | Permalinks/Archive | Mobile | RSS | Print


HOW TO HELP: Charity Navigator has assembled a list of highly rated charities working to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

VALUES
The Forsaken

Great natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina do indeed "wash away the surface of society, the settled way things have been done." In one sense, they remind us of our common vulnerabilities. As Sari Lankan tsunami victim Nimal Premasiri said of the American hurricane victims, "God has made us equals in birth, life and death." Yet such disasters also "expose the underlying power structures, the injustices, the patterns of corruption and unacknowledged inequalities." In the past week, the media has been slow to acknowledge the sharp inequalities revealed in Katrina's wake. Yesterday, CNN correspondent Jack Cafferty criticized his colleagues for ignoring the "elephant in the room" -- "the race and economic class of most of the victims the media hasn't discussed much at all." In truth, the images from the Superdome and from across the Gulf Coast of mostly poor and black Americans did much to reinforce the "growing sense that race and class are the unspoken markers of who got out and who got stuck." There, on camera, "the tired and hungry seethed, saying they had been forsaken." But images aren't enough. The story of Katrina's effect on the growing American underclass must still be told.

POVERTY AND NEW ORLEANS: Nearly a third of New Orleanians live below the poverty line. "Only a handful of large American cities have lower household incomes." Conditions are even worse for children. Fully half of the kids in Louisiana live in poverty -- the only state with a higher child poverty rate is Mississippi, another victim of Katrina. One quarter of New Orleans residents -- some 134,000 people -- don't own a car. The city is 67 percent African American, but the Lower Ninth Ward neighborhood, "which was inundated by the floodwaters," is more than 98 percent black. There, "only 6 percent of residents are college graduates," compared to the national average of 22 percent. "Average household income in that neighborhood is $27,499 a year, not even half the national average of $56,644. One-quarter of the Lower Ninth Ward's households earn less than $10,000 a year." The city was already vulnerable.

STRANDED -- AND STARING DOWN KATRINA: By Monday, harsh rain and 145 mph winds were bearing down on New Orleans. Tens of thousands "found themselves left behind by a failure to plan for their rescue," despite the fact that they were "living in tumbledown neighborhoods that were long known to be vulnerable to disaster if the levees failed." One CNN reporter noted, "A lot of the people we spoke to [who were stranded], these are people who work for a living. They're making minimum wage, they're supporting families. They don't have a car. They wanted to evacuate before the storm came, but they couldn't evacuate because they tell us they didn't have transportation." Time and again, residents despaired that Katrina had struck when it did, just a few days shy of payday. David Schuster observed, "Those are the people who died because they couldn't afford a tank of gas." Katrina had already demonstrated "what experts have known all along -- disasters do not treat everyone alike," said NBC's Bob Faw. "Surviving is easier for whites who have than for blacks who don't."

HORROR AT THE SUPERDOME: Those escaping the city by foot headed to the Superdome. "They were told, 'Go over there. Don't worry. You're going to get food and water and you're going to get transportation out of town,'" MSNBC reported. Instead, the refugees found a disorganized scene that quickly devolved into chaos: "A 2-year-old girl slept in a pool of urine. Crack vials littered a restroom. Blood stained the walls next to vending machines smashed by teenagers. 'We pee on the floor. We are like animals,' said Taffany Smith, 25, as she cradled her 3-week-old son, Terry. In her right hand she carried a half-full bottle of formula provided by rescuers. Baby supplies are running low; one mother said she was given two diapers and told to scrape them off when they got dirty and use them again. At least two people, including a child, have been raped. At least three people have died, including one man who jumped 50 feet to his death, saying he had nothing left to live for. There is no sanitation. The stench is overwhelming." At one point, a despondent crowd gathered outside the stadium and simply began to chant "We want help! We want help!" Later, a woman stood on the front steps of the New Orleans convention center and "led the crowd in reciting the 23rd Psalm, 'The Lord is my shepherd...'"

DESPERATION TURNS TO LOOTING: Meanwhile, residents stuck in the city -- many of whom had been without food or water for days -- began looting local stores. "Much of what's being taken are essentials: anything edible, disposable diapers, water and clothes," reports noted. Yet looped images of people ransacking stores for electronics and luxury items were a staple of network coverage. Ironically, these events revealed the character of several prominent conservatives as much as anyone. Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan: "I hope the looters are shot." Glenn Reynolds, the most popular conservative blogger: "People [looting valuables] should be shot." Atlanta talk show host Neil Boortz: "Now I'm serious here ... not just saying this for effect. Shoot to kill."

RECOVERY WILL BE HAMPERED BY POVERTY: Already we know that recovery efforts following Katrina will be massive. President Bush has acknowledged that "New Orleans is more devastated than New York was" after the September 11 terrorist attacks. "We need an effort of 9-11 proportions," former New Orleans Mayor Marc Morial said yesterday. "A great American city is fighting for its life." Yet the widespread poverty in New Orleans and throughout the Gulf Coast means reconstruction will face an additional setback. "If this [level of disaster] were to happen in California, okay, fine. There's a number of incentives to sort of rebuild that area." NBC's Kevin Corke pointed out yesterday. "Imagine trying to do that in rural Mississippi. It's going to be difficult, and I think that there's a sense ... that this is going to take us into several administrations, I imagine, as they continue to try to bring back this area."


ADMINISTRATION
Incompetent Response

Disaster experts and Louisiana government officials charged the administration "failed to plan for a serious levee breech and the federal response to Hurricane Katrina was slow." The San Francisco Chronicle writes, "Disturbing images of thousands of Americans dehydrated, hungry and unable to escape an uninhabitable city are prompting angry questions about whether the richest nation in the world is doing everything it can to respond to New Orleans' disaster." CNN commentator Jack Cafferty emotionally disparaged the federal response: "No one -- no one -- says the federal government is doing a good job in handling one of the most atrocious and embarrassing and far-reaching and calamitous things that has come along in this country in my lifetime." The lack of straight answers regarding the administration's preparedness in the past, present, and future has only given rise to increasing public concern that that the federal government is not and has not been doing enough to help Katrina victims.

LOCAL OFFICIALS SEE NO COMMAND OR CONTROL: Local government officials in the disaster region are telling the story of an inadequate federal response to the hurricane recovery effort. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin said federal officials "don't have a clue what's going on down here." Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco said federal assistance has been problematic. "We would have wanted massive numbers of helicopters on Day One," Blanco said, while also calling for more troops. "This is a national disgrace. FEMA has been here three days, yet there is no command and control," said Terry Ebbert, head of New Orleans's emergency operations. "We're just a bunch of rats. That's how they've been treating us." Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA) noted he was calling the White House, pleading for more resources. "The state resources were being overwhelmed, and we needed direct federal assistance, command and control, and security -- all three of which are lacking." Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) said there was a failure think about a "holistic approach to the evacuation effort." "Help, help, help," came the plea from New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin. "This is a desperate S.O.S."

ADMINISTRATION IN DISARRAY: The response from the Bush administration has been an array of dizzying signals about its priorities and concern. FEMA Director Michael Brown, responding to the "horrible, horrible conditions" in the New Orleans Convention Center, said, "the federal government did not even know about the convention center people until today." Secretary Chertoff, when asked about the victims in the convention center, said, "I have not heard a report of people in the convention center who don't have food and water." In an interview with CNN, Chertoff offered little compassion for people who died or were trapped in cities due to the flooding. "Some people chose not to obey that [mandatory evacuation] order. That was a mistake on their part." In Florida, Gov. Jeb Bush and other state officials criticized FEMA's decision to deny federal assistance to hurricane victims in that state.

CONCERNS OVER LEVEE FUNDING: The Washington Post reported that federal budget cuts last year "stopped major work on New Orleans east bank hurricane levees for the first time in 37 years." The problem resulted because the Bush administration "requested less money for programs to guard against catastrophic storms in New Orleans." President Bush has declared that no one "anticipated the breech of the levees," but a former FEMA official said earlier this year, "New Orleans was the No.1 disaster we were talking about." Disaster experts and frustrated officials "said a crucial shortcoming may have been the failure to predict that the levees keeping Lake Pontchartrain out of the city would be breached, not just overflow." Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, commander of the Army Corps of Engineers, defended the administration by suggesting full funding would not have prevented the levee breech, but he admitted that had the flood control project been finished, "we could more efficiently move the water out of the system because it's a big drainage project." Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, said, "There was a failure by [Bush] to meet the responsibility here.... Somebody needs to say it."



Under the Radar

VALUES -- HASTERT SUGGESTED NOT REBUILDING NEW ORLEANS: Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert said yesterday that it made no sense to spend billions of dollars to rebuild New Orleans. "It looks like a lot of that place could be bulldozed," said Hastert. Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco responded, "To kick us when we're down and destroy hope, when hope is the only thing we have left, is absolutely unthinkable for a leader in his position." Hastert later attempted to clarify his remarks, saying he was not advocating the city "be abandoned or relocated" and that his "sincere concern" was with how the city would be rebuilt. Hastert's clarification did not include an apology.

ADMINISTRATION -- FEMA REFUSES TO ALLOW FLORIDA AIRBOATS TO HELP WITH RESCUE AND RECOVERY EFFORTS: FEMA Director Michael Brown has acknowledged the agency's inadequate response to the hurricane recovery efforts. Floridians want to help by volunteering 500 airboat pilots to help rescue hurricane victims and transport relief workers. But FEMA won't let them in. Robert Dummett, state coordinator of the Florida Airboat Association, said, "We cannot get deployed to save our behinds" because FEMA will not authorize them to enter New Orleans. Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) thinks providing airboats to the region is "a perfect solution to the chaos and difficulty getting people out of their flooded homes." James Brown, a manager of 14 airboats, said, "We're willing to go, we're able to go, but it's all up to FEMA."

LABOR -- THE GOOD LIST: Monday is Labor Day, a celebration of the American worker. Many companies "profess that they must implement massive layoffs, slash benefits, employ temporary and cheap labor, and hire unionbusters to prevent workers from forming unions in order to remain profitable in today’s marketplace." Other businesses know better. American Rights at Work has released a list "to recognize successful partnerships between employers and their employees’ labor unions that are working well in the global economy." Check it out.

CIVIL RIGHTS -- CALIFORNIA SENATE VOTES TO LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE: In a step forward for gay rights, the California State Senate "approved legislation Thursday that would legalize same-sex marriages." The bill now moves to the state assembly "which narrowly rejected a gay marriage bill in June." Right-wing legislators in California have gone on the attack. State Senator Dennis Hollingsworth "suggested that 'higher power' opposed the legislation." A spokesman for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger "would not comment about how the governor would act if the bill is sent to his desk."

Western States Sue Bush Administration over Decision to Open Pristine Forests

By Terence Chea
The Associated Press

Wednesday 31 August 2005

San Francisco - California, New Mexico and Oregon sued the Bush administration Tuesday over the government's decision to allow road building, logging and other commercial ventures on more than 90,000 square miles of untouched forests.

In the lawsuit, attorneys general for the three states challenged the US Forest Service's repeal of the Clinton administration's "roadless rule" that banned development on 58.5 million acres of national forest, mostly in western states.

The administration's move puts at risk "some of the last, most pristine portions of America's national forests," California Attorney General Bill Lockyer said. "Road building simply paves the way for logging, mining and other kinds of resource extraction."

In January 2001, just eight days before he left office, President Clinton put almost one-third of the nation's 192 million acres of national forest off-limits to road construction, winning praise from conservation groups and criticism from the timber industry.

But in May, the Bush administration replaced the regulation with a new policy requiring states to work with the Forest Service to decide how to manage individual forests. Governors were given 18 months either to petition the agency to keep their states' forests protected or to open the undeveloped areas to roads and development.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleges that the Bush administration's repeal of the roadless rule violated federal law because the government did not conduct a complete analysis of the new regulation's environmental impact.

The attorneys general who filed the suit are all Democrats.

Mark Rey, the Agriculture Department's undersecretary for natural resources and environment, called the lawsuit "unfortunate and unnecessary."

"The quickest way to provide permanent protection is through the development of state-specific rules, not by resuscitating the 2001 rule," Rey said.

He pointed out that the Clinton-era rule has been struck down in federal court. In 2003, a federal judge in Wyoming ruled that the executive branch had overstepped its authority by effectively creating wilderness areas on US Forest Service land. In July, the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed environmentalists' appeal of that ruling, saying the new Bush rule made the issue moot.

Why New Orleans Is in Deep Water

Why New Orleans Is in Deep Water
By Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate

Thursday 01 September 2005

Austin, Texas - Like many of you who love New Orleans, I find myself taking short mental walks there today, turning a familiar corner, glimpsing a favorite scene, square or vista. And worrying about the beloved friends and the city, and how they are now.

To use a fine Southern word, it's tacky to start playing the blame game before the dead are even counted. It is not too soon, however, to make a point that needs to be hammered home again and again, and that is that government policies have real consequences in people's lives.

This is not "just politics" or blaming for political advantage. This is about the real consequences of what governments do and do not do about their responsibilities. And about who winds up paying the price for those policies.

This is a column for everyone in the path of Hurricane Katrina who ever said, "I'm sorry, I'm just not interested in politics," or, "There's nothing I can do about it," or, "Eh, they're all crooks anyway."

Nothing to do with me, nothing to do with my life, nothing I can do about any of it. Look around you this morning. I suppose the National Rifle Association would argue, "Government policies don't kill people, hurricanes kill people." Actually, hurricanes plus government policies kill people.

One of the main reasons New Orleans is so vulnerable to hurricanes is the gradual disappearance of the wetlands on the Gulf Coast that once stood as a natural buffer between the city and storms coming in from the water. The disappearance of those wetlands does not have the name of a political party or a particular administration attached to it. No one wants to play, "The Democrats did it," or, "It's all Reagan's fault." Many environmentalists will tell you more than a century's interference with the natural flow of the Mississippi is the root cause of the problem, cutting off the movement of alluvial soil to the river's delta.

But in addition to long-range consequences of long-term policies like letting the Corps of Engineers try to build a better river than God, there are real short-term consequences, as well. It is a fact that the Clinton administration set some tough policies on wetlands, and it is a fact that the Bush administration repealed those policies - ordering federal agencies to stop protecting as many as 20 million acres of wetlands.

Last year, four environmental groups cooperated on a joint report showing the Bush administration's policies had allowed developers to drain thousands of acres of wetlands.

Does this mean we should blame President Bush for the fact that New Orleans is underwater? No, but it means we can blame Bush when a Category 3 or Category 2 hurricane puts New Orleans under. At this point, it is a matter of making a bad situation worse, of failing to observe the First Rule of Holes (when you're in one, stop digging).

Had a storm the size of Katrina just had the grace to hold off for a while, it's quite likely no one would even remember what the Bush administration did two months ago. The national press corps has the attention span of a gnat, and trying to get anyone in Washington to remember longer than a year ago is like asking them what happened in Iznik, Turkey, in A.D. 325.

Just plain political bad luck that, in June, Bush took his little ax and chopped $71.2 million from the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers, a 44 percent reduction. As was reported in New Orleans CityBusiness at the time, that meant "major hurricane and flood projects will not be awarded to local engineering firms. Also, a study to determine ways to protect the region from a Category 5 hurricane has been shelved for now."

The commander of the corps' New Orleans district also immediately instituted a hiring freeze and canceled the annual corps picnic.

Our friends at the Center for American Progress note the Office of Technology Assessment used to produce forward-thinking plans such as "Floods: A National Policy Concern" and "A Framework for Flood Hazards Management." Unfortunately, the office was targeted by Newt Gingrich and the Republican right, and gutted years ago.

In fact, there is now a governmentwide movement away from basing policy on science, expertise and professionalism, and in favor of choices based on ideology. If you're wondering what the ideological position on flood management might be, look at the pictures of New Orleans - it seems to consist of gutting the programs that do anything.

Unfortunately, the war in Iraq is directly related to the devastation left by the hurricane. About 35 percent of Louisiana's National Guard is now serving in Iraq, where four out of every 10 soldiers are guardsmen. Recruiting for the Guard is also down significantly because people are afraid of being sent to Iraq if they join, leaving the Guard even more short-handed.

The Louisiana National Guard also notes that dozens of its high-water vehicles, Humvees, refuelers and generators have also been sent abroad. (I hate to be picky, but why do they need high-water vehicles in Iraq?)

This, in turn, goes back to the original policy decision to go into Iraq without enough soldiers and the subsequent failure to admit that mistake and to rectify it by instituting a draft.

The levees of New Orleans, two of which are now broken and flooding the city, were also victims of Iraq war spending. Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, said on June 8, 2004, "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq."

This, friends, is why we need to pay attention to government policies, not political personalities, and to know whereon we vote. It is about our lives.

Personal Update

I have been having a lot of trouble recently posting to this blog. I can't seem to figure out what the problem is. I've asked blogger for assistance and all I get is the automated response. If I can't get the problem solved this weekend I'm going to abandon this blog and establish CRAPII.

I want to thank all of you who have recently e-mailed me and said how much you're enjoying this blog and to keep up the good work. You don't know how much that is appreciated. Sometimes I'll be "blogging" along for weeks on end with no feedback and wonder if I'm just wasting my time. Then I get a response from someone who says that they have found something useful or inspirational here and that just brightens my day.

I'm still trying to figure out all the technology so that this blog can be more interactive but being a novice "techie", and someone who works away from the house for 12 hours or more a day, it makes it a little difficult to try and figure out the intricacies of the software. I really am more of a big picture and idea guy than I am a tech but I'll keep trying to figure it all out. Again, thanks for your support and if I have to start a new blog I'll try to post the new address here.

PEACE.....................Scott

Sunday, September 25, 2005

TRUTHOUT

Brace for More Katrinas, Say Experts
http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/083105EA.shtml
For all its numbing ferocity, Hurricane Katrina will not be a unique event, say
scientists, who say that global warming appears to be pumping up the power of
big Atlantic storms. More and more scientists estimate that global warming,
while not necessarily making hurricanes more frequent or likelier to make
landfall, is making them more vicious.


Economy Creating Fewer Jobs for Women, Younger Workers
http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/083105WB.shtml
The economic recovery is shorting women and young people. A new study by the
Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), "Gender Bias in the Current
Economic Recovery - Declining Employment Rates for Women in the 21st Century,"
compares employment growth at this point in the recovery with its performance in
prior economic recoveries.


'Thousands Dead' in New Orleans
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/083105Q.shtml
Hurricane Katrina is thought to have killed hundreds, probably thousands of
people in New Orleans, the city's mayor, Ray Nagin said. There will be a total
evacuation of the 50,000 to 100,000 people left in the city. It is estimated
that 15,000 a day can be evacuated. More than 20,000 people are still staying in
the Superdome where sanitary conditions are rapidly deteriorating.


How Katrina Turned Off the Oil
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/083105R.shtml
A detailed facility-by-facility report on Gulf Coast refineries and pipelines.
The amount of lost production is enormous. Roughly 1.9 million barrels per day
of refining capacity on the Gulf Coast went off-line, with many plants down
completely and others operating at reduced rates.


Anti-War Band Wins MTV Awards
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/083105S.shtml
Green Day, the anti-war rockers, swept the MTV Video Music Awards in a sign that
American popular culture is turning against the US presence in Iraq.

In Katrina's Wake

DID GOD SEND THE HURRICANE?
Deborah Caldwell, Beliefnet
This natural disaster is bringing together a perfect storm
of environmentalist and religious doomsday sayers.
http://www.alternet.org/story/24878/

WHY THE LEVEE BROKE
Will Bunch, Attytood
Washington knew exactly what needed to be done to protect
the citizens of New Orleans from disasters like Katrina.
Yet federal funding for Louisiana flood control projects
was diverted to pay for the war in Iraq.
http://www.alternet.org/story/24871/

KATRINA'S ECONOMIC IMPACT
Mark Trumbull, Christian Science Monitor
As it ripples through the economy in coming weeks, the
storm's effects could be big enough to spur wide-ranging
changes to our energy infrastructure.
http://www.alternet.org/story/24868/

VALUES / WEATHER

VALUES
Bush Asks Not

Speaking to a nation that was in the midst of confronting monumental challenges such as poverty and war, President John F. Kennedy said in his 1961 inaugural address, "My fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you -- ask what you can do for your country ... ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you." Speaking from the Rose Garden to a nation that is simultaneously fighting a war and dealing with perhaps the greatest natural disaster in U.S. history, President George W. Bush failed to issue any such call for sacrifice. The New York Times writes in an editorial, "Sacrifices may be necessary to make sure that all these things happen in an orderly, efficient way. But this administration has never been one to counsel sacrifice."

BUSH COULD SACRIFICE TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY: Marshall Loeb, editor of Money and Fortune magazines, writes, "The President could show that he, too, is prepared to sacrifice for Katrina's victims, perhaps by rolling back some of his planned tax cuts. The nation can ill afford to pay for a war, tax reductions and this disaster recovery at the same time." But Bush has given no indications he will back off his ideological agenda of more tax cuts which primarily benefit the wealthy. Pete Peterson, former secretary of Commerce under Nixon, wrote, "After 9/11, [the administration] faced a choice between tax cuts and getting serious about the extensive measures needed to protect this nation against further terrorist attacks. They chose tax cuts." And again, as the Iraq war commenced, Bush faced a similar choice. But catering to the arguments of conservative ideologues like Tom DeLay, who argued, "Nothing is more important in the face of a war than cutting taxes," Bush again failed to call for sacrifice and instead chose tax cuts. Despite the devastating economic impact of Katrina, conservatives are already positioning themselves for a vote next Tuesday on the next priority item: repealing the estate tax -- a tax paid by the wealthiest one percent of Americans who inherit at least $1.5 million.

BUSH COULD CALL FOR CONSERVATION: The president of American Petroleum Institute, Red Cavaney, said, "The impact of this devastating storm on oil and natural gas operations will be significant and protracted.... Let us understand: This is not an easy thing." His solution? "Right now would be a good time for everybody to sort of ramp up your energy conservation," Cavaney said, even offering energy-saving tips which could help increase fuel efficiency. AAA is also urging motorists to drive less and conserve fuel. President Bush had an opportunity yesterday to publicly elevate the need for energy conservation, but failed to make the call for sacrifice. Bush implored citizens to "understand this storm has disrupted the capacity to make gasoline and distribute gasoline" but offered no suggestions as to how Americans should cope with the crisis. He should take his cue from Gov. Mike Easley of North Carolina, who said recently, "I am asking all North Carolinians to conserve gas."

IF YOU ASK, THEY WILL RESPOND: Shortly after the attacks of 9/11, Sen. John McCain complained, "After 9/11, people wanted to serve and they were told to go shopping or get on an airplane.... That's not the answer they wanted to hear. This is an opportunity to serve." Americans have demonstrated time and again that, in the face of tragedy, they will respond with true compassion. Already, the Red Cross has announced that it has collected $21 million in donations for the victims of Katrina, "a figure comparable to the response for tsunami victims following the devastation in Asia earlier this year." "The outpouring of support has been amazing," said Kara Bunte, a spokeswoman for the Red Cross. "People are now starting to see the images on TV and want to help." Americans also responded with amazing compassion in the two months following 9/11, providing approximately 1.6 million blood donations and contributing over $1.3 million to charities and relief agencies. Americans can and will do more to sacrifice; they simply need a president who will ask.


WEATHER
Questions of Preparedness

Hurricane Katrina will likely be the worst natural disaster in our nation's history. If indeed thousands have perished, as New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin predicted yesterday, it will also be the deadliest natural disaster in the United States in at least a century, since the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. And as one Louisiana paper put it, "No one can say they didn't see it coming." There have been "decades of repeated warnings about a breach of levees or failure of drainage systems that protect New Orleans from the Mississippi River and Lake Pontchartrain." It's "inappropriate to 'blame' anyone for a natural disaster," the Washington Post rightly observes. "But given how frequently the impact of this one was predicted, and given the scale of the economic and human catastrophe that has resulted, it is certainly fair to ask questions about disaster preparations." Below, a few of those questions:

WHERE WERE THE PLANS FOR EMERGENCY DISASTER RELIEF?: The response to Hurricane Katrina "is exposing serious failures by government leaders and crisis planners before Katrina's arrival and flawed execution by relief agencies as the disaster unfolded," the Wall Street Journal reports this morning. Communication failures have been widespread, local officials "found they lacked critical equipment and materials to use in repairs if levees breached," and even "basic emergency management" has been lacking. For instance, former FEMA chief James Lee Witt told reporters yesterday that "in the 1990s, in planning for a New Orleans nightmare scenario, the federal government figured it would pre-deploy nearby ships with pumps to remove water from the below-sea-level city and have hospital ships nearby." Now federal officials say a hospital ship won't leave its port in Baltimore until tomorrow, and isn't expected to arrive for seven days. "These things need to be planned and prepared for; it just doesn't look like it was," Witt said. Other reporters offered a chilling, first-hand perspective: "[A] striking feature of the situation there was the scant presence of civil authority. We did see police controlling some intersections but we saw no military authority and no Red Cross or other health authority. It did not appear that any disaster center had been established by the authorities to communicate with the public. There appeared to be very little, if any, response yet to the enormous challenge of housing, feeding and supporting a devastated population."

WHY WAS GULF COAST DISASTER PREPARATION SUCH A LOW PRIORITY?: The planning failures were not limited to the short-term emergency response. As Louisiana Rep. Bobby Jindal (R), one of three members of Congress whose homes were destroyed by Hurricane Katrina, said yesterday: "If we had been investing resources in restoring our coast, it wouldn't have prevented the storm but the barrier islands would have absorbed some of the tidal surge." Unfortunately, the resources were not invested -- either in coastal restoration or the levees -- despite years of pleas. On June 8, 2004, the emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, complained about a lack of funding for the levees, a long stretch of which had sunk by four feet: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us." The money never came through, and last year, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "essentially stopped major work" on the levee system that has now been breached. "It was the first such stoppage in 37 years." Additionally, federal flood control spending for southeastern Louisiana was "chopped from $69 million in 2001 to $36.5 million in 2005," Knight-Ridder reports, even as "federal hurricane protection for the Lake Pontchartrain vicinity in the Army Corps of Engineers' budget dropped from $14.25 million in 2002 to $5.7 million this year." The cuts were strenuously opposed by Louisiana representatives, who "urged Congress earlier this year to dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana's coast, only to be opposed by the White House."

WHY WERE FEMA'S PREPAREDNESS MISSIONS DISMANTLED?: "The advent of the Bush administration in January 2001 signaled the beginning of the end for FEMA," one expert writes. In particular, the White House targeted the agency's "mitigation" programs -- "the measures taken in advance to minimize the damage caused by natural disasters" -- which emergency specialists consider "a crucial part of the strategy to save lives and cut recovery costs." Shortly after coming into office, "key federal disaster mitigation programs, developed over many years, [were] slashed and tossed aside." FEMA's Project Impact, "a model mitigation program created by the Clinton administration," was canceled outright by the Bush administration on February 28, 2001 -- ironically, the very same day of the 6.8 magnitude Nisqually earthquake in Washington state, which provided one of the "best examples of the impact the program had" in protecting people. Indeed, FEMA employees were officially "directed not to become involved in disaster preparedness functions, since a new directorate (yet to be established) will have that mission."

WHY WERE INEXPERIENCED POLITICAL APPOINTEES PICKED TO HEAD FEMA?: Since taking office, President Bush "has appointed, in succession, his 2000 campaign manager and an Oklahoma lawyer whose only emergency management experience prior to joining FEMA was as an assistant city manager." According to one emergency expert, these officials "showed little interest in its work or in the missions pursued by the departed [former FEMA chief James Lee Witt]," who led emergency management in Arkansas and "reoriented FEMA from civil defense preparations to a focus on natural disaster preparedness and disaster mitigation." Indeed, Washington Monthly editor Daniel Franklin yesterday noted, "The difficulties of coordination seem to indicate we've returned to the bad old days where the FEMA administrator position is given away on the basis of political favor, rather than hard experience."

UNDERNEWS

SEP 1, 2005
FROM THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW
EDITED BY SAM SMITH
Since 1964, Washington's most unofficial source

E-MAIL: mailto:news@prorev.com
1312 18th St. NW #502 Washington DC 20036
202-835-0770 Fax: 835-0779

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WORD
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Nothing is enough to the man for whom enough is too little. - Epicurus

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE SECOND BATTLE OF NEW ORLEANS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Sam Smith

THE SECOND BATTLE OF NEW ORLEANS is already underway: a struggle over
how to respond to the greatest natural disaster of our history. It is
far too early to draw conclusions but soon enough for a few questions:

- What will be the iconographic role of this disaster? Will it - as it
should - eclipse 9/11 as the central moment of contemporary history, or
will it be subtly reduced to second place so the business at hand in
Washington - i.e. whatever war it is conducting - can continue to retain
semiotic hegemony? What is the relative importance of 16 acres in New
York City versus tens of thousands in Louisiana?

- How much will we be willing to pay to restore one of our major cities
and its citizens compared to what we have paid to create a manmade
disaster in Iraq or to end constitutional government in the wake of
9/11? Current estimates of pending special appropriations set the number
at something less than 10% of what we are spending annually in Iraq. If
that how we value ourselves?

- Will the meaning of this disaster, like 9/11, be repeatedly distorted
by various parties of interest in a manner that blasphemes the memory of
its victims and perverts its history?

- What effect will the fact that many of the victims of 9/11 were white
and powerful while many of the victims of New Orleans' disaster were
black and so poor they couldn't get out of town alter the story we come
to tell of the event? Does the mayor's decision to remove police from
search and rescue so they could fight looting suggest a demographic
subtext? Is the marketplace worth more than life itself? In what ways
would the response to this disaster have been different if it its major
victims had been lighter and wealthier? If the stranded had been in Palm
Beach, what would we have done?

- If FEMA put a Category 5 hurricane in New Orleans on the same level as
a terrorist attack in New York City or an earthquake in San Francisco,
why did the White House and the Department of Homeland Security only
show substantial interest in, and fund remedies for, the New York
version of potential catastrophe? Does this qualify as criminal
negligence?

- If everyone knew that New Orleans was an accident waiting to happen
why were so few precautions taken? As just one example, why were not
residents encouraged to have or provided inflatable rafts and life
jackets in their homes along with the sort of food supplies promoted
following 9/11?

- Why does the government and the media persist in the notion that a
major disaster requires centralized control - if not martial law -
imposed from Washington? It is clear already that the most competent
response to this disaster came at the local and state level and that the
feds weren't even able to provide food, water, shelter and other
logistical supplies in a timely matter. Both common sense and the 10th
Amendment dictate that in a major disaster control should devolve to the
governors, not to some covertly selected cabal in Washington. It is
interesting to note that while FEMA and the Pentagon were still trying
to get their act together, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell called the
governor of Mississippi to say that 2,500 of his National Guard troops
were on their way. In other words, a Democratic and a GOP governor from
vastly different states got matters coordinated even as the
monolithically incompetent Bush regime was still figuring out what to
do.

- What lessons can be learn from the fact that the Coast Guard was the
best organized federal agency - rescuing 2600 people in few days with
only 4,000 personnel? As Jim Ridgeway notes in the Village Voice, "it
was the Coast Guard commander in New York who organized one of the most
extraordinary operations maritime rescues since Dunkirk on 9-11, pulling
together, ferries, tugs, yachts, and all sorts of other boats to
evacuate half a million people from downtown New York." One explanation:
the Coast Guard is highly decentralized (like local fire departments)
with a lot of authority vested at the local level. It also places a high
emphasis on competence, again like fire departments. When you are in a
disaster your best friends are highly qualified rescuers who can make
decisions without waiting for headquarters to tell them what to do.

- Will we finally learn from this experience that we - despite our
invasions and our Ipods - are still part of nature, and must respect and
work with it rather than ignoring and exploiting it? Or will we continue
to view nature as just another problem for FEMA and the Corps of
Engineers to solve?

- Will we finally suppress the pathological arrogance that has gotten us
into such trouble in recent years and try a little well-founded humility
for a change?

- Will it matter? The first Battle of New Orleans was fought several
weeks after the Treaty of Ghent was signed. Maybe this battle will prove
too late as well.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KATRINA
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

WILL BUNCH, ATTYTOOD - The $750 million Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity
Hurricane Protection project is another major Corps project, which
remains about 20% incomplete due to lack of funds, said Al Naomi,
project manager. That project consists of building up levees and
protection for pumping stations on the east bank of the Mississippi
River in Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles and Jefferson parishes. The
Lake Pontchartrain project is slated to receive $3.9 million in the
president's 2005 budget. Naomi said about $20 million is needed.

"The longer we wait without funding, the more we sink," he said. "I've
got at least six levee construction contracts that need to be done to
raise the levee protection back to where it should be (because of
settling). Right now I owe my contractors about $5 million. And we're
going to have to pay them interest."

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for
Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, told the Times-Picayune: "It appears that
the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland
security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay.
Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are
doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue
for us.". . .

The Newhouse News Service article published Tuesday night observed, "The
Louisiana congressional delegation urged Congress earlier this year to
dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana's coast, only to be
opposed by the White House. . . In its budget, the Bush administration
proposed a significant reduction in funding for southeast Louisiana's
chief hurricane protection project. Bush proposed $10.4 million, a sixth
of what local officials say they need."

Washington knew that this day could come at any time, and it knew the
things that needed to be done to protect the citizens of New Orleans.
But in the tradition of the riverboat gambler, the Bush administration
decided to roll the dice on its fool's errand in Iraq, and on a tax cut
that mainly benefited the rich. Now Bush has lost that gamble, big time.


http://www.alternet.org/story/24871/

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

FRED FELDMAN, CAMPUS ANTIWAR NETWORK - The New Orleans mayor has ordered
police to stop "looting" in a city which he says will be uninhabitable
for at least the next three months. . .

The cops are being given a license to kill, in circumstances in which
the whole black population of the city has been systematically
criminalized by the media nationally. The campaign to scapegoat the
black survivors in the ruined city is likely to reach a bloody new
stage? The victims of the catastrophe -- labeled as "the worst in us" --
are to be sacrificed to the political cover-up of the perpetrators of
the catastrophe (who represent, of course, the best we have to offer).

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

ROBERT D. MCFADDEN AND RALPH BLUMENTHAL, NY TIMES - Chaos gripped New
Orleans on Wednesday as looters ran wild, food and water supplies
dwindled, bodies floated in the floodwaters, the evacuation of the
Superdome began and officials said there was no choice but to abandon
the city devastated by Hurricane Katrina, perhaps for months. . .

With police officers and National Guard troops giving priority to saving
lives, looters brazenly ripped open gates and ransacked stores for food,
clothing, television sets, computers, jewelry and guns, often in full
view of helpless law-enforcement officials. Dozens of car-jackings,
apparently by survivors desperate to escape, were reported, as were a
number of shootings.

On Wednesday night, Mayor Nagin ordered 1,500 police officers, most of
the city's force, to turn from search and rescue to stopping the
looting. "They are starting to get closer to the heavily populated areas
- hotels, hospitals, and we're going to stop it right now," he said in a
statement issued to The Associated Press. . .

Hundreds were still huddled on rooftops or isolated on patches of
ground, where they have awaited rescue for two days without food or
water. An armada of small boats was out, rescuing many from flooded
areas in the poorest sections of New Orleans. . . Some perched on
sections of Interstate 10 that were still standing, though much of the
highway had collapsed. Cars shimmered eerily underwater, and basketballs
floated on the surface, along with children's swimming floats, trees and
other debris.

The bulk of the city's refugees were in or around the Superdome, which
has become a shelter of last resort for more than 20,000 people. Gov.
Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana said conditions there had become
desperate, with food, water and other supplies running out, with toilets
overflowing and the air foul, with temperatures hitting 100 degrees and
tempers flaring.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/
la-na-levees1sep01,0,5235285,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

RALPH VARTABEDIAN LA TIMES - Draining the billions of gallons of water
that has inundated New Orleans could take three to six months,
substantially longer than some experts have expected, the Army Corps of
Engineers said.

Col. Richard Wagenaar, the corps' senior official in New Orleans, said
that the estimate was based on planning done as Hurricane Katrina
approached and that it remained the corps' best estimate. He is
directing the agency's recovery efforts. The estimate depends on
favorable weather. Additional rain or other problems could cause more
delays, Wagenaar warned. . .

Walter Baumy, a chief engineer, said that the corps was confronted by
riverbeds clogged with loose barges and debris and that it could not
find contractors able to maneuver heavy equipment into the flood zone. .
.

The city's 22 pumping stations are not operating, and most are
underwater. Not until the city naturally drains a little can the corps
begin restoring pumping capacity, Wagenaar said. . .

Corps officials think water rose over the top of the canal wall and
cascaded down to its base, scouring a hole that undermined the
foundation, said Al Naomi, the corps' senior project engineer in New
Orleans. "It exceeded the design surge," he said. "It just blew out the
wall."

The dirt levees and reinforced concrete flood walls are designed to hold
back an 11 1/2-foot storm surge, not including waves spilling over the
top. The Katrina surge is believed to have been significantly higher
than that. . .

A mathematical model on storm surges pioneered by Notre Dame University
professor Joannes Westerink increased concern that the levee system was
exposing New Orleans to a major catastrophe in the case of any storm
bigger than a Category 3. "In a slow-moving Category 5 hurricane, the
levees are not going to hold," Westerink said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-levees1sep01,0,7854368.story?coll=la-home-headlines


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

GREAT THOUGHTS OF GW BUSH WHILE FLYING ABOVE NOLA - "It's devastating,"
POTUS said as he watched, according to Scott McClellan. "It's got to be
doubly devastating on the ground."

NY TIMES - They had flocked to the arena seeking sanctuary from the
winds and waters of Hurricane Katrina. But understaffed, undersupplied
and without air-conditioning or even much lighting, the domed stadium
quickly became a sweltering and surreal vault, a place of overflowing
toilets and no showers. Food and water, blankets and sheets, were in
short supply. And the dome's reluctant residents exchanged horror
stories, including reports, which could not be confirmed by the
authorities, of a suicide and of rapes.

By Wednesday the stink was staggering. Heaps of rotting garbage in
bulging white plastic bags baked under a blazing Louisiana sun on the
main entry plaza, choking new arrivals as they made their way into the
stadium after being plucked off rooftops and balconies. The odor
billowing from toilets was even fouler. Trash spilled across corridors
and aisles, slippery with smelly mud and scraps of food.

"They're housing us like animals," said Iiesha Rousell, 31, unemployed
after four years in the Army in Germany, dripping with perspiration in
the heat, unable to contain her fury and disappointment at being left
with only National Guardsmen as overseers and no information about what
might lie ahead.

Once inside the dome, refugees were told that for their own safety they
could not leave - the flood waters climbed four feet up the walls
outside - and many likened the shelter to a prison.

Michael Childs, 45 and a housepainter, went a step further. "It's worse
than a prison," said Mr. Childs, who knew something about the subject,
having spent three months in the Orleans Parish Prison on a
drunken-driving charge. "In prison you have a place to urinate, a place
for other bathroom needs. Here you get no water, no toilets, no lights.
You get all that in prison."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/01/national/nationalspecial/01dome.html

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

JACK SHAFER, SLATE - I can't say I saw everything that the TV
newscasters pumped out about Katrina, but I viewed enough repeated
segments to say with 90 percent confidence that broadcasters covering
the New Orleans end of the disaster demurred from mentioning two topics
that must have occurred to every sentient viewer: race and class.

Nearly every rescued person, temporary resident of the Superdome,
looter, or loiterer on the high ground of the freeway I saw on TV was
African-American. And from the look of it, they weren't wealthy
residents of the Garden District. This storm appears to have hurt blacks
more directly than whites, but the broadcasters scarcely mentioned that
fact. . .

To be sure, some reporters sidled up to the race and class issue. I
heard them ask the storm's New Orleans victims why they hadn't left town
when the evacuation call came. Many said they were broke—"I live from
paycheck to paycheck," explained one woman. Others said they didn't own
a car with which to escape and that they hadn't understood the
importance of evacuation.

But I don't recall any reporter exploring the class issue directly by
getting a paycheck-to-paycheck victim to explain that he couldn't risk
leaving because if he lost his furniture and appliances, his pots and
pans, his bedding and clothes, to Katrina or looters, he'd have no way
to replace them. No insurance, no stable, large extended family that
could lend him cash to get back on his feet, no middle-class job to
return to after the storm.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2124688/?nav=ais

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

REPENT AMERICA - Just days before "Southern Decadence", an annual
homosexual celebration attracting tens of thousands of people to the
French Quarters section of New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina destroys the
city. "Southern Decadence" has a history of filling the French Quarters
section of the city with drunken homosexuals engaging in sex acts in the
public streets and bars. . . On the official "Southern Decadence"
website it states that the annual event brought in "125,000 revelers" to
New Orleans last year, increasing by thousands each year, and up from
"over 50,000 revelers" in 1997. . .

"Although the loss of lives is deeply saddening, this act of God
destroyed a wicked city," stated Repent America director Michael
Marcavage. "From 'Girls Gone Wild' to 'Southern Decadence,' New Orleans
was a city that had its doors wide open to the public celebration of
sin. From the devastation may a city full of righteousness emerge," he
continued.

New Orleans is also known for its Mardi Gras parties where thousands of
drunken men revel in the streets to exchange plastic jewelry for drunken
women to expose their breasts. This annual event sparked the creation of
the "Girls Gone Wild" video series.

"We must help and pray for those ravaged by this disaster, but let us
not forget that the citizens of New Orleans tolerated and welcomed the
wickedness in their city for so long," Marcavage said. "May this act of
God cause us all to think about what we tolerate in our city limits, and
bring us trembling before the throne of Almighty God," Marcavage
concluded.

http://www.repentamerica.com/pr_hurricanekatrina.html

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

ROBERT KENNEDY JR, HUFFINGTON POST - As Hurricane Katrina dismantles
Mississippi's Gulf Coast, it's worth recalling the central role that
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour played in derailing the Kyoto
Protocol and kiboshing President Bush's iron-clad campaign promise to
regulate CO2.

In March of 2001, just two days after EPA Administrator Christie Todd
Whitman's strong statement affirming Bush's CO2 promise former RNC Chief
Barbour responded with an urgent memo to the White House.

Barbour, who had served as RNC Chair and Bush campaign strategist, was
now representing the president's major donors from the fossil fuel
industry who had enlisted him to map a Bush energy policy that would "be
friendly to their interests. His credentials ensured the new
administration's attention.". . .

"A moment of truth is arriving," Barbour wrote, "in the form of a
decision whether this Administration's policy will be to regulate and/or
tax CO2 as a pollutant. The question is whether environmental policy
still prevails over energy policy with Bush-Cheney, as it did with
Clinton-Gore." He derided the idea of regulating CO2 as "eco-extremism,"
and chided them for allowing environmental concerns to "trump good
energy policy, which the country has lacked for eight years.". . .

On March 13, Bush reversed his previous position, announcing he would
not back a CO2 restriction using the language and rationale provided by
Barbour. Echoing Barbour's memo, Bush said he opposed mandatory CO2
caps, due to "the incomplete state of scientific knowledge" about global
climate change.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/afor-they-that-sow-the-_b_6396.html


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

PAUL SIMAO, REUTERS, BILOXI - The legalization of gambling in Biloxi
created an economic boom in the early 1990s and the city developed a
reputation as a place where a person could get a decent-paying job in
the casino or hospitality business. But not everyone prospered. In the
devastated streets and atop the rubble piles where their homes stood
before Katrina blew through, a bitter refrain is increasingly heard.
Poor and low-income residents complain that they have borne the brunt of
the hurricane's wrath.

"Many people didn't have the financial means to get out," said Alan
LeBreton, 41, an apartment superintendent who lived on Biloxi's seaside
road, now in ruins. "That's a crime and people are angry about it."

Many of the town's well-off heeded authorities' warnings to flee north,
joining thousands of others who traveled from the Gulf Coast into
northern Mississippi and Alabama, Georgia and other nearby states.

Hotels along the interstates and other main roads were packed with these
temporary refugees. Gas stations and convenience stores -- at least
those that were open -- sold out of water, ice and other supplies within
hours.

But others could not afford to join them, either because they didn't own
a car or couldn't raise funds for even the cheapest motel. . .

Resentment at being left behind in the path of one of the fiercest
hurricanes on record may have contributed to some of the looting that
occurred in Biloxi and other coastal communities. A number of private
residences, including some in upscale neighborhoods, were targeted,
residents said.

http://reuters.myway.com/article/20050901/2005-09-01T021157Z_01_MOL181874_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-BT-WEATHER-KATRINA-POVERTY-DC.html


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

ANN GERHART, WASHINGTON POST - There are four levels of hell inside the
refugee city of the Superdome, home to about 15,000 people since Sunday.
On the artificial-turf field and in the lower-level seats where Montrel
sat sweltering with her family, a form of civilization had taken hold --
smelly, messy, dark and dank, but with a structure. Families with cots
used their beds as boundaries for personal space and kept their areas
orderly, a cooler on one corner, the toys on another, almost as if they
had come for fireworks and stayed too long.

The bathrooms, clogged and overflowing since Monday, announced the
second level of hell, the walkway ringing the entrance level. In the
men's, the urinal troughs were overflowing. In the women's, the bowls
were to the brim. A slime of excrement and urine made the walkway slick.
"You don't even go there anymore," said Dee Ford, 37, who was pushed in
a wading pool from her flooded house to the shelter. "You just go
somewhere in a corner where you can. In the dark, you are going to step
in poo anyway."
. . .

"With no hand-washing, and all the excrement," said Sgt. Debra Williams,
who was staffing the infirmary in the adjacent sports arena, "you have
about four days until dysentery sets in. And it's been four days today."
. . .

Within the skyboxes, on the third level of hell, life was dark 24 hours
a day, a place for abandonment and coupling. Also up there was "a sort
of speakeasy," said Michael Childs, who had some beer in an empty Dannon
water bottle. "You got to know where to go," he said, and grinned. "And
you just put your bottle under the spigot. It is disgusting in here, and
I lost everything I had, and I'm glad to have found a little beer."

On the fourth level, the darkest and highest of all, the lurkers lived,
scary in the shadows. The fourth level, people explained, was for the
gangsters and the druggies. The rumors sprang from there: Two girls had
been raped; one girl had been raped and one killed. Someone was
abducting newborns. A man had jumped from there and died. A murder had
occurred.

"None of that," said Maj. Bush, who had been at the Superdome, along
with about 200 other Guard members and a few New Orleans policemen,
since Monday. An older man did jump to his death, but not from the
fourth level. Two residents died, and two were born, both births
attended by a physician. Bush did not know if either child had been
named Katrina.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/31/AR2005083102801.html


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

BOING BOING - My friend Ned Sublette passes along an email attributed to
a rescue worker in New Orleans. Ned says: "The poorest 20% of the city
was left behind to drown. This was the plan. Forget the sanctimonious
bullshit about the bullheaded people who wouldn't leave. The evacuation
plan was strictly laissez-faire. It depended on privately owned
vehicles, and on having ready cash to fund an evacuation. The planners
knew full well that the poor, who in new orleans are overwhelmingly
black, wouldn't be able to get out. The resources -- meaning, the
political will -- weren't there to get them out. White per capita income
in Orleans parish, 2000 census: $31,971. Black per capita: $11,332.
Median *household* income in B.W. Cooper Housing Projects, 2000:
$13,263.

http://www.boingboing.net/2005/08/30/email_attributed_to_.html

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

WASHINGTON POST - Nagin also estimated that 50,000 to 100,000 people
stayed in the city of 485,000 despite earlier evacuation orders, and
said they would now be evacuated at the rate of 14,000 to 15,000 a day.
He said the city would "not be functional" for about three months.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/31/AR2005083101804.html


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

LINTON WEEKS WASHINGTON POST - Benigno E. Aguirre of the Disaster
Research Center at the University of Delaware has been watching and
reading about looters in Louisiana. "It may look from the outside as if
they are stealing or breaking the law," says Aguirre, "when in fact some
of them are trying to survive." On the other hand, he says, some of the
thieves are garden-variety crooks. "There is always a very small number
of people that are predisposed to crime, and they see a disaster as an
opportunity to act."

There are the disenfranchised who jump at the chance to get even with
those who have more stuff than they do. "Disasters can become
opportunity for class warfare, and that kind of appropriation of other
people's property should be prosecuted," he says,

There are looters, he says, but "people use the concept of looting
without making distinctions."

Many may be people taking drastic measures required by drastic times.
And some, he says, are the in-an-emergency equivalent of
hunters/gatherers, foraging for food, fresh water, medicine, matches,
batteries, everyday essentials that are just not available. Not at home,
not at shelters. . .

Here's a recent exchange between Nancy Grace and Anderson Cooper of CNN:

"It's my understanding," Grace said, "that there has been rampant
looting. In fact, martial law declared in other areas. Have you seen
looting?"

Cooper replied, "I wouldn't call it looting. What I have seen is
desperate people kind of wandering around here in downtown Gulfport.
There are a lot of police here in Gulfport, so you can't get away with
looting. But I have seen people picking stuff up from the wreckage. I
saw a man with two bottles of olive oil. He was hoping to try to cook
something up. He says he has no water. He doesn't really have much of a
place to go. So there are a lot of people just desperately in need."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/31/AR2005083102681_pf.html


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

SCOTT GOLD, LA TIMES - A 2-year-old girl slept in a pool of urine. Crack
vials littered a restroom. Blood stained the walls next to vending
machines smashed by teenagers. . . "We pee on the floor. We are like
animals," said Taffany Smith, 25, as she cradled her 3-week-old son,
Terry. In her right hand she carried a half-full bottle of formula
provided by rescuers. Baby supplies are running low; one mother said she
was given two diapers and told to scrape them off when they got dirty
and use them again.

At least two people, including a child, have been raped. At least three
people have died, including one man who jumped 50 feet to his death,
saying he had nothing left to live for. . .

"There is feces on the walls," said Bryan Hebert, 43, who arrived at the
Superdome on Monday. "There is feces all over the place."

Most refugees are given two 9-ounce bottles of water a day and two boxed
meals: spaghetti, Thai chicken or jambalaya. One man tried to escape
Wednesday by leaping a barricade and racing toward the streets. The man
was desperate, National Guard Sgt. Caleb Wells said. Everything he was
able to bring to the Superdome had been stolen. His house had probably
been destroyed, his relatives killed.

"We had to chase him down," Wells said. "He said he just wanted to get
out, to go somewhere. We took him to the terrace and said: 'Look.' "
Below, floodwaters were continuing to rise, submerging cars. "He didn't
realize how bad things are out there," Wells said. "He just broke down.
He started bawling. We took him back inside."

The soldiers — most are sleeping two or three hours a night, and many
have lost houses — say they are doing the best they can with limited
resources and no infrastructure. But they have become the target of many
refugees' anger.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-superdome1sep01,0,2041291,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

AUDREY HUDSON, WASHINGTON TIMES - About 4,000 Coast Guardsmen are
helping with relief efforts. . . With only a skeletal fleet of 25 rescue
helicopters based in Louisiana and Alabama, three-man crews, including
rescue swimmers, are flying nonstop and have rescued more than 1,250
victims in the flood-swollen region. [Now up to 2600- TPR] The highly
trained swimmers are using axes to break through roofs before pulling
soaking wet victims to safety, who are then airlifted to hospitals for
medical care or to the closest dry patch of land. "Unfortunately, in a
situation like this, you're seeing the Coast Guard do what it does best
-- saving lives," Petty Officer 3rd Class Larry Chambers said. "The
importance of life is job one for us. "When they see the orange and
white bird and those guys in orange uniforms coming down for them, they
feel a lot better," Petty Officer Chambers said. . .

http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20050831-102439-6981r


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MORE ECHOES OF NEW ORLEANS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

MORE ECHOES OF NEW ORLEANS

[Thanks to various readers]

Whippoorwill's singing, on a soft summer breeze;
Makes me think of my baby, I left down in New Orleans,
I left down in New Orleans;
Magnolia, you sweet thing, you're driving me mad
Got to get back to you, babe;
You're the best I ever had;
You're the best I ever had;
You whisper "Good morning," so gently in my ear;
I'm coming home to you, babe;
I'll soon be there;
I'll soon be there.

- John J. Cale

NOLA

It's not so much the relentless photographs of floods, the debris of our
lives smashed and scattered, or even the obsession I have developed to
read something - anything, about Lessepps Street where Lee Grue lives.

Kalamu ya Salam made it to Houston, is mostly off line, Ahmos ZuBolton
died last year, so it's not personal ties or the memories I have of the
Big Easy, or the story this morning about the Crescent Hotel in the
Quarter that brought up generators one last time to cook a hot breakfast
for everyone, anyone, a piano player performing Stormy Weather.

It's not sweet memories -- eating Eggs Benedict at Brennans when I was
ten. My parents took us on a long car trip from Illinois to California
then down through Texas, across to New Orleans and then back home
through the Smoky Mountains, America the Beautiful, and now devastation,
or walking into a perfume shop and buying a bottle of White Shoulders
which lasted well into my teens because Mother insisted it was just for
special events, like church, weddings, graduations, funerals. . . -
Susan Bright

http://earthfamilyalpha.blogspot.com/2005/08/nola.html

Back water rising, coming in my windows and doors
I leave with a prayer in my heart: back water won't rise no more

[Attributed to Blind Lemon Jefferson]


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ECOLOGY
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

SOME GREAT APE SPECIES MAY E GONE WITHIN A GENERATION

BBC - Some of the great apes - chimps, gorillas, and orangutans - could
be extinct in the wild within a human generation, a new assessment
concludes.
Human settlement, logging, mining and disease mean that orangutans in
parts of Indonesia may lose half of their habitat within five years.
There are now more than 20,000 humans on the planet for every
chimpanzee. . .


"All of the great apes are listed as either endangered or critically
endangered," co-author Lera Miles from the World Conservation Monitoring
Centre near Cambridge told the BBC News website. "Critically endangered
means that their numbers have decreased, or will decrease, by 80% within
three generations." One critically endangered species is the Sumatran
orangutan, of which around 7,300 remain in the wild.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4202734.stm

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FIELD NOTES
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

STRIKES AND BOYCOTTS OF MAJOR HOTELS AROUND THE COUNTRY
http://www.hotellaboradvisor.info/hotelguidestrike.asp