News and Views you don't have to lose:

Comment: The question I have after find all the work that researchers have done on 911, I am amazed that the main stream news media has jumped on this 911 cover-up. But of course, they still don't get it about JFK's assassination or drug trafficking by the CIA.

The impossible video camera work of 9/11
The Zoom-Out Clue

http://www.911hoax.com/gZoomOut.asp?intPage=12&PageNum=12

http://www.911hoax.com/gCameraPlanet1.asp?intPage=59&PageNum=59

Source: http://www.media-criticism.com/911_video_fakes_01_2004.html


9-11 Media Hoax

The UA175 aircraft that struck WTC2 was travelling at an airspeed at least 100 mph outside its operational envelope. (meaning it was going faster than it was built to go).
Assuming the hijacked Boeing 767-200 was able to maintain structural integrity at this high airspeed the crew would have been under a great deal of pressure to navigate and maintain control of the aircraft during the final stages of the approach to WTC2. Yet the allaged group of Arab hijackers lacking the years of experience gained by a professional crew of 767 pilots would have been an unlikely choice for the command and execution of this suicide mission. We can therefore say with a high degree of certainty that this aspect of the ‘official’ version of events is incorrect.

Next is the impact of the alleged hijacked Boeing 767-200 with the WTC2 tower. Computer simulation and mathematical analysis of the impact by MIT, University of Purdue and others indicate that upon impact the wings of the 767 would have shattered and the fuel ignited outside the towers facade, the aircraft would have lost about 25% percent of its kinetic energy on impact and that the tail fin would have sheared off due to torsional forces. In layman’s terms this means that the aeroplane would have decelerated sharply, crumpled up and exploded against the tower’s wall with only heavy objects like the engines and undercarriage puncturing the towers facade. No film or photograph of the impact and aftermath shows any of these predicted effects.

-----------

The UA175 illusion however, was not 100% successful

Firstly, the hi-tech trick was exposed by a few amateur cameramen and photographers that caught the optical illusion either videographically or photographically and their evidence surfaced in the months that followed, but it never had widespread exposure and consequently escaped the eyes of the masses.

Secondly, someone in the loop blew the whistle by producing defective fakes that could easily be discerned from a 'real' fake and then mixed them in with the remaining media. Under close scrutiny these deliberate fakes can be exposed, but to the layman they remain invisible.

Exposing A Typical Fake Image:

1 - The starboard wing on the UA175 aircraft is the wrong shape.

2 - The ‘Port Wing Anomaly’ is evident - a true sign of Whistle Blowing fakery.

3 - The trailing edge angles on both wings on the UA175 aircraft are incorrect.

4 - UA175 aircraft has a deformed tail fin section.

5 - The relative position of the wings on the UA175’s airframe are incorrect.

6 - There are absent specular highlights from rear airframe section and starboard wing fairing (not clear on CG model).

7 - There is no evidence of the underside reflective strip on the UA175 aircraft despite favourable sun illumination.

8 - The airframe of the UA175 aircraft is much too dark given the prevailing lighting conditions.

http://www.gallerize.com/2005-01-11_001_MI_SG_UA175.htm

The drag at sea level will not increase compared with the drag at cruise altitude, but experienced pilots estimate that the speed of the alleged flight UA175 hitting south tower is well beyond the performance envelope of a Boeing 767-200.

In other words, at the given speed at sea level, the flying object at south tower was no Boeing 767-200.

http://www.gallerize.com/HOW_SOUTH_TOWER_WAS_HIT.htm

Impossible Linear Speed While Passing Through Steel Obstacle

Proof that the visible plane-image did not decelerate upon entering south tower - it even accelerated!



http://www.gallerize.com/Grossmann-Russell_Argument_WTC2_Hit.htm



The absurdity of the south tower craft is summarized by a graphic created by Marcus Icke in a computer flight simulator. This is the image of a passenger plane fading into a steel highrise without explosion, crumple, sparks, deceleration. When analyzed in slow motion, all the TV horror videos of 9-11 show exactly this same absurdity:



http://www.gallerize.com/Pentagon%20Graphics.html

Why did Air Traffic Controllers in a Nashua Telegraph article report an F-16 was circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time of crash - and why does the Government currently DENY that?

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/2002/new/1.htm


For a plane that flew into the ground, Flight 93 left a rather widespread debris field. Investigators found a second debris field three miles away from the main crash site at Indian Lake, and a third debris field in New Baltimore, eight miles away. 1 NTSB officials suggested that the debris at these distant locations blew there in the wind after the crash, but eyewitnesses at Indian Lake saw the debris falling out of the sky, like confetti. One of the engines was 600 feet from the main debris field by some accounts and a mile by others.
Source: http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/flight93.html

Hijacking it without the pilot being able to alert ground control is nearly impossible. The pilot has only to punch in a four-digit code to alert ground control to a hijacking.

We are expected to believe the 19 Arab hijackers took control of the plane without the crew first getting a chance to punch in the four diget hijacking code. Not just on one plane, but on all four.

The hijackers had allegedly been limited training on a Cessnas and flight simulators, but this was no barrier to them skillfully flying the 767 and a 757 jets to their doom.

The Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane. The plane was vapourized by the fuel tank explosion maintain these space loonies, but the people inside it were all but one identified by DNA testing.

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren01.htm


As pointed out by Carol Valentine and Dick Eastman, the first floor of the western wedge of the Pentagon was occupied in part by the office of the "Chief of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot", who had moved into their new offices (early) and many were killed, as reported by the Washington Post, 1/20/2002 (quoted by Valentine, not independently confirmed by the authors.) Valentine noted that this Naval Intelligence office was responsible for breaking open the Jonathon Pollard affair, and Eastman speculated that had they survived, they might have had the responsibility to mount an independent investigation of all the events of 9-11 and its associated "intelligence failures".

http://www.911-strike.com/siding-scam.htm

Bombing Mastermind Aswat Works for MI-6


The Friday London meeting was addressed by David Shayler, the MI-5 domestic counter-intelligence whistleblower who is appealing a six-month prison sentence for violating the Official Secrets Act with his revelations about collusion between the British foreign intelligence organization MI-6 and al Qaeda.

Also present at the London meeting was Shayler’s fellow MI-5 veteran Annie Machon, the author of Spies, Lies, and Whistleblowers: MI5, MI6 and the Shayler Affair (Sussex UK: The Book Guild, 2005), a book which tells the story of how these two whistleblowers met in the MI-5 offices and came to understand the many rogue operations that were going on in the British intelligence community

http://www.communitycurrency.org/tourreport.html

British intelligence paid large sums of money to an al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a doomed attempt to assassinate Colonel Gadaffi in 1996 and thwarted early attempts to bring Osama bin Laden to justice.
The latest claims of MI6 involvement with Libya's fearsome Islamic Fighting Group, which is connected to one of bin Laden's trusted lieutenants, claims MI5 officer David Shayler.


At the very moment the British police were supposedly looking high and low for Dewsbury resident Haroon Rashid Aswat, pegged as the London bombing “mastermind,” MI-6 was quietly stowing him away for safe keeping. In fact, they were protecting him as an asset.

The The Daily Mail newspaper said it had obtained FBI documents indicating Aswat was sent to America in 1999 where he had firearms and poison training.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NIM20050803&articleId=794

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,9174,837333,00.html

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose